Paper · 2013 · Environment Control in Biology

Simulation Model for Predicting Fruit Yield of Tomatoes Grown on a Single-truss System under Shade in Summer

Teruo WADA; Hideo IKEDA; Hiroaki HIRAI; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was carried out to make a simulation model for predicting the fruit yield of tomatoes in summer. Tomato seeds were sown monthly from February to September. Plants were grown hydroponically on a single-truss system in 0, 30, 55, and 83% shade. Total fruit yield per plant increased linearly with increasing integrated solar radiation from the first flower anthesis to the first fruit harvest. When all data from all crops were pooled, the regression line did not have as high a coefficient of determination (r2=0.73) as it did with the unpooled data. Most of the regression lines fitted to the data from each crop individually had higher coefficients of determination, except for lines plotted for the June and July crops. The slope (r2=0.929) and the x intercept (r2=0.860) of the regression lines, except for the June crop, were correlated with averaged air temperature during fruit development linearly and quadratically, respectively. From these results, the simulation model for predicting fruit yield from both integrated solar radiation and averaged air temperature was constructed. The model could be applied at 19 to 27°C of averaged air temperature. Standard error of cross-validation (SECV) of the data excluding the June crop was lower (92.1) in the model modified with air temperature, compared with the model with only integrated solar radiation (111.4).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield rose linearly with integrated radiation.

Treatment
integrated solar radiatione0
Outcome
Total fruit yield per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield per plant increased linearly with increasing integrated solar radiation from the first flower anthesis to the first fruit harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled regression fit was weaker than separate crop fits.

Outcome
coefficient of determinatione0
Value
r2=0.73e0
Comparator
unpooled datae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When all data from all crops were pooled, the regression line did not have as high a coefficient of determination (r2=0.73) as it did with the unpooled data.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most crop-specific regressions had higher fit except June and July.

Outcome
coefficients of determinatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
June and July cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the regression lines fitted to the data from each crop individually had higher coefficients of determination, except for lines plotted for the June and July crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression slopes correlated linearly with development temperature.

Treatment
averaged air temperaturee0
Outcome
slopee0
Value
r2=0.929e0
Qualifier
except for the June crope0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The slope (r2=0.929) and the x intercept (r2=0.860) of the regression lines, except for the June crop, were correlated with averaged air temperature during fruit development linearly and quadratically, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression x intercepts correlated quadratically with development temperature.

Treatment
averaged air temperaturee0
Outcome
x intercepte0
Value
r2=0.860e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The slope (r2=0.929) and the x intercept (r2=0.860) of the regression lines, except for the June crop, were correlated with averaged air temperature during fruit development linearly and quadratically, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model applied across average temperatures of 19 to 27°C.

Outcome
model could be appliede0
Value
19 to 27°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The model could be applied at 19 to 27°C of averaged air temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding air temperature reduced cross-validation error versus radiation alone.

Outcome
Standard error of cross-validation (SECV)e0
Direction
lowere0
Value
92.1e0
Qualifier
111.4e0
Comparator
model with only integrated solar radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Standard error of cross-validation (SECV) of the data excluding the June crop was lower (92.1) in the model modified with air temperature, compared with the model with only integrated solar radiation (111.4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–55 · show in text ↑