Paper · 1996 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Evaluation of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Legume Intercropping Under 1:1 and 2:1 Row‐replacement Series System

P. Banik

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
100
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 1992–93 and 1993–94 at Agricultural Experimental Farm, Giridih, Bihar to evaluate the intercropping systems of legumes, gram ( Cicer arietinum L.), pea ( Pisum sativum ) and lentil ( Lens culinaris ) with wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) in 1:1 and 2:1 ‘row replacement series’. Intercropping systems were assessed on the basis of new indices termed as actual yield loss (AYL) and intercropping advantage (IA). This paper highlights the comparative effectiveness of evaluating the intercropping systems through the existing intercropping indices like LER, RCC, aggressivity. The indices AYL and IA seem to be more appropriate particularly when per plant yield is considered. Intercropping reduced the yield of component crops compared with respective pure stands. Wheat + pea in 1:1 row replacement series gave the highest wheat yield equivalent value (3.02 t ha −1 ) followed by wheat + lentil (2.91 tha −1 ). When the actual sown proportion was considered wheat + lentil (1:1) resulted in maximum AYL (+0.610) and IA (+0.279) values. This treatment also gave the maximum monetary advantage (Rs 5985.45 ha −1 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AYL and IA were considered more appropriate indices when per-plant yield was used.

Outcome
more appropriatee0
Comparator
per plant yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The indices AYL and IA seem to be more appropriate particularly when per plant yield is considered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“with wheat ( Triticum aestivum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced yields of the component crops relative to pure stands.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
yield of component cropse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
respective pure standse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced the yield of component crops compared with respective pure stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“with wheat ( Triticum aestivum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plus pea in 1:1 rows gave the highest wheat yield equivalent of 3.02 t ha −1.

Treatment
Wheat + pea in 1:1 row replacement seriese0
Outcome
wheat yield equivalent valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.02 t ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat + pea in 1:1 row replacement series gave the highest wheat yield equivalent value (3.02 t ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–932 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plus lentil had wheat yield equivalent of 2.91 tha −1.

Treatment
wheat + lentile0
Outcome
wheat + lentile0
Value
2.91 tha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by wheat + lentil (2.91 tha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plus lentil at 1:1 had the maximum AYL of +0.610.

Treatment
wheat + lentil (1:1)e0
Outcome
AYLe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
+0.610e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat + lentil (1:1) resulted in maximum AYL (+0.610) and IA (+0.279) values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plus lentil at 1:1 had the maximum IA of +0.279.

Treatment
wheat + lentil (1:1)e0
Outcome
IAe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
+0.279e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat + lentil (1:1) resulted in maximum AYL (+0.610) and IA (+0.279) values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same wheat plus lentil treatment gave maximum monetary advantage of Rs 5985.45 ha −1.

Treatment
wheat + lentil (1:1)e1
Outcome
monetary advantagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs 5985.45 ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also gave the maximum monetary advantage (Rs 5985.45 ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat + lentil (1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1043 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.