Paper · 2010 · Engineering in Agriculture Environment and Food

Investigation of Temporal and Spatial Variability for Green Tea Growth Using Precision Agriculture Technology

Chanseok Ryu; Masahiko Suguri; Mikio Umeda

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Spatial and temporal variability of new shoots (number of shoots, dry mass and nitrogen concentration) were investigated under several conditions using precision agriculture technology. The growth and spatial variability of new shoots were both determined using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). At harvest, there were differences in new shoots growth depending on variety, severe shading, and nitrogen fertilizer type. There were differences in new shoot for “Ten-cya” compared to that for “Sen-cya,” and temporal variability of growth had a different tendency compared to spatial variability at harvest depending on several conditions. Coefficients of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) were established by the NDVI model. The accuracy was R2≥0.826 with RMSE≤15.0 g/m2 for “Sen-cya” and R2≥0.877 with RMSE≤13.6 g/m2 (vegetation coverage ratio ≤ 100%) for “Ten-cya”.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New shoot growth varied with variety, shading and nitrogen fertilizer type at harvest.

Taxon
Green Teat0
Treatment
severe shadinge0
Outcome
new shoots growthe0
Direction
differencese0
Qualifier
variety, severe shading, and nitrogen fertilizer typee0

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, there were differences in new shoots growth depending on variety, severe shading, and nitrogen fertilizer type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-cya new shoots differed from Sen-cya shoots.

Taxon
Green Teat0
Material
Ten-cyae0
Outcome
new shoote0
Direction
differencese0
Comparator
Sen-cyae0

Verbatim

e0

“There were differences in new shoot for “Ten-cya” compared to that for “Sen-cya,””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temporal growth variability showed a different tendency from spatial variability at harvest.

Taxon
Green Teat0
Outcome
temporal variability of growthe0
Direction
different tendencye0
Comparator
spatial variabilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“temporal variability of growth had a different tendency compared to spatial variability at harvest depending on several conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NDVI model attained R2 at least 0.826 and RMSE at most 15.0 g/m2 for Sen-cya.

Taxon
Green Teat0
Material
Sen-cyae0
Outcome
accuracye0
Value
R2≥0.826 with RMSE≤15.0 g/m2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The accuracy was R2≥0.826 with RMSE≤15.0 g/m2 for “Sen-cya””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NDVI model attained R2 at least 0.877 and RMSE at most 13.6 g/m2 for Ten-cya.

Taxon
Green Teat0
Material
Ten-cyae0
Outcome
R2≥0.877 with RMSE≤13.6 g/m2e0
Value
R2≥0.877 with RMSE≤13.6 g/m2e0
Qualifier
vegetation coverage ratio ≤ 100%e0

Verbatim

e0

“R2≥0.877 with RMSE≤13.6 g/m2 (vegetation coverage ratio ≤ 100%) for “Ten-cya””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑