Paper · 2005 · Journal of Vegetable Science

Validation of 1,3-Dichloropropene Plus Chloropicrin Broadcast Application in Tomato Grower Fields

James P. Gilreath; Bielinski M. Santos; Phyllis R. Gilreath; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a need to test the efficacy of weed control technologies on a commercial scale. Therefore, large-plot field studies were conducted on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) farms during 1999 and 2000 to compare the effect of 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin (1,3-D + Pic) application methods on rootknot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.), nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) populations, and tomato growth and fruit yield. Treatments were 1,3-D + Pic (65:35 v/v) applied broadcast at 250 L.ha−1; 1,3-D + Pic (65:35 v/v) applied in-bed at 330 L.ha−1; and methyl bromide (MBr) + Pic (67:33 v/v) applied in-bed at 350 kg.ha−1. Both 1,3-D + Pic treatments received a broadcast application of the herbicide pebulate at a rate of 4 kg.ha−1 before fumigant injection. The results indicated that MBr + Pic and 1,3-D + Pic applied in-bed + pebulate resulted in the lowest rootknot counts, with nearly three times less nematodes than treatment with 1,3-D + Pic applied broadcast + pebulate. However, there were no differences among the treatments for nutsedge density, tomato plant height and vigor, and marketable and non-marketable fruit weight. This finding indicated that by applying 1,3-D + Pic broadcast, it is possible to reduce fumigant rates and personnel poisoning risks and maintain the same tomato yield, and nutsedge and rootknot nematode control as with MBr + Pic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-bed 1,3-D + Pic with pebulate gave the lowest root-knot nematode counts, nearly three times fewer than broadcast 1,3-D + Pic with pebulate.

Treatment
1,3-D + Pic applied in-bed + pebulatee1
Interactor
nematodesNematodae1pathogen
Outcome
rootknot countse1
Direction
loweste1
Value
nearly three times lesse1
Comparator
1,3-D + Pic applied broadcast + pebulatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“MBr + Pic and 1,3-D + Pic applied in-bed + pebulate resulted in the lowest rootknot counts, with nearly three times less nematodes than treatment with 1,3-D + Pic applied broadcast + pebulate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–981 · show in text ↑
e2

“large-plot field studies were conducted on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MBr + Pic gave the lowest root-knot nematode counts, nearly three times fewer than broadcast 1,3-D + Pic with pebulate.

Treatment
MBr + Pice1
Interactor
nematodesNematodae1pathogen
Outcome
rootknot countse1
Direction
loweste1
Value
nearly three times lesse1
Comparator
1,3-D + Pic applied broadcast + pebulatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“MBr + Pic and 1,3-D + Pic applied in-bed + pebulate resulted in the lowest rootknot counts, with nearly three times less nematodes than treatment with 1,3-D + Pic applied broadcast + pebulate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–981 · show in text ↑
e2

“large-plot field studies were conducted on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not differ in nutsedge density.

Treatment
the treatmentse3
Interactor
nutsedgee3weed
Outcome
nutsedge densitye3
Direction
no differencese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“large-plot field studies were conducted on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–196 · show in text ↑
e3

“there were no differences among the treatments for nutsedge density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not differ in tomato plant height and vigor.

Treatment
the treatmentse4
Outcome
plant height and vigore4
Direction
no differencese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“there were no differences among the treatments for nutsedge density, tomato plant height and vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not differ in marketable and non-marketable fruit weight.

Treatment
the treatmentse5
Outcome
marketable and non-marketable fruit weighte5
Direction
no differencese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“there were no differences among the treatments for nutsedge density, tomato plant height and vigor, and marketable and non-marketable fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1138 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast 1,3-D + Pic application could reduce fumigant rates and maintain tomato yield.

Treatment
1,3-D + Pic broadcaste6
Outcome
reduce fumigant ratese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“by applying 1,3-D + Pic broadcast, it is possible to reduce fumigant rates and personnel poisoning risks and maintain the same tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1307 · show in text ↑

bromomethane · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.