Paper · 2014 · Scientific Reports

Effects of halving pesticide use on wheat production

L. Hossard; A. Philibert; M. Bertrand; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
92
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Pesticides pose serious threats to both human health and the environment. In Europe, farmers are encouraged to reduce their use, and in France a recent environmental policy fixed a target of halving the pesticide use by 2018. Organic and integrated cropping systems have been proposed as possible solutions for reducing pesticide use, but the effect of reducing pesticide use on crop yield remains unclear. Here we use a set of cropping system experiments to quantify the yield losses resulting from a reduction of pesticide use for winter wheat in France. Our estimated yield losses resulting from a 50% reduction in pesticide use ranged from 5 to 13% of the yield obtained with the current pesticide use. At the scale of the whole country, these losses would decrease the French wheat production by about 2 to 3 millions of tons, which represent about 15% of the French wheat export.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% pesticide reduction was estimated to reduce winter wheat yield by 5 to 13% of current-use yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
50% reduction in pesticide usee0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
5 to 13%e0
Comparator
current pesticide usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our estimated yield losses resulting from a 50% reduction in pesticide use ranged from 5 to 13% of the yield obtained with the current pesticide use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat in France”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

National wheat production was estimated to fall by about 2 to 3 millions of tons.

Outcome
French wheat productione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
about 2 to 3 millions of tonse0
Setting
Frenche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these losses would decrease the French wheat production by about 2 to 3 millions of tons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–830 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

That production loss represents about 15% of French wheat exports.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
French wheat exporte0
Value
about 15%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which represent about 15% of the French wheat export”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat in France”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–555 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.