Paper · 2003 · Genetika

Genetic variance of sunflower yield components - Heliantus annuus L.

Nada Hladni; Dragan Skoric; Marija Kraljevic-Balalic

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The main goals of sunflower breeding in Yugoslavia and abroad are increased seed yield and oil content per unit area and increased resistance to diseases, insects and stress conditions via an optimization of plant architecture. In order to determine the mode of inheritance, gene effects and correlations of total leaf number per plant, total leaf area and plant height, six genetically divergent inbred lines of sunflower were subjected to half diallel crosses. Significant differences in mean values of all the traits were found in the F1 and F2 generations. Additive gene effects were more important in the inheritance of total leaf number per plant and plant height, while in the case of total leaf area per plant the nonadditive ones were more important looking at all the combinations in the F1 and F2 generations. The average degree of dominance (Hi/D)1/2 was lower than one for total leaf number per plant and plant height, so the mode of inheritance was partial dominance, while with total leaf area the value was higher than one, indicating super dominance as the mode of inheritance. Significant positive correlation was found: between total leaf area per plant and total leaf number per plant (0.285*) and plant height (0.278*). The results of the study are of importance for further sunflower breeding work.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 and F2 generations differed significantly in mean values of all studied traits.

Outcome
mean values of all the traitse0
Comparator
F1 and F2 generationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences in mean values of all the traits were found in the F1 and F2 generations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–560 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additive gene effects were more important for total leaf number per plant and plant height.

Outcome
inheritance of total leaf number per plant and plant heighte0
Direction
more importante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Additive gene effects were more important in the inheritance of total leaf number per plant and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–669 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonadditive effects were more important for total leaf area per plant.

Outcome
total leaf area per plante0
Direction
more importante0
Qualifier
nonadditive onese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“while in the case of total leaf area per plant the nonadditive ones were more important looking at all the combinations in the F1 and F2 generations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf number per plant had partial dominance, with average dominance below one.

Organ / stage
total leaf number per plante0
Outcome
mode of inheritance was partial dominancee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The average degree of dominance (Hi/D)1/2 was lower than one for total leaf number per plant and plant height, so the mode of inheritance was partial dominance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height had partial dominance, with average dominance below one.

Organ / stage
plant heighte0
Outcome
mode of inheritance was partial dominancee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The average degree of dominance (Hi/D)1/2 was lower than one for total leaf number per plant and plant height, so the mode of inheritance was partial dominance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area showed super dominance.

Organ / stage
total leaf areae0
Outcome
super dominance as the mode of inheritancee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“while with total leaf area the value was higher than one, indicating super dominance as the mode of inheritance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1094 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area and total leaf number were significantly positively correlated at 0.285*.

Organ / stage
total leaf number per plante0
Outcome
total leaf area per plante0
Direction
positivee0
Value
0.285*e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Significant positive correlation was found: between total leaf area per plant and total leaf number per plant (0.285*) and plant height (0.278*).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1240 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area and plant height were significantly positively correlated at 0.278*.

Organ / stage
plant heighte0
Outcome
total leaf area per plante0
Direction
positivee0
Value
0.278*e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Significant positive correlation was found: between total leaf area per plant and total leaf number per plant (0.285*) and plant height (0.278*).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1240 · show in text ↑