Paper · 1980 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

EFFECT OF WEED COMPETITION AND WEED CONTROL PROGRAMS ON RUTABAGA YIELD

J. A. IVANY

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of different periods of weed competition and of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), niclofen (2,4-dichloro-phenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether), and cultivations were studied for effects on yield of rutabaga (Brassica napobrassica Mill. ’York’). Delaying weed removal for 4 wk after crop emergence significantly reduced yields of marketable and total roots compared with plots kept weed-free all season. Delayed weeding beyond 4 wk resulted in progressively greater reductions in yield. Rutabagas kept weed-free for 2, 4, 6, and 8 wk from crop emergence by once-weekly weeding gave yields comparable to those kept weed-free all season. Herbicide treatments without hand-weeding gave significantly lower yields than those with one hand-weeding. The use of three hand-weedings with herbicides was not significantly better than herbicides with one hand-weeding. Level of weed control was dependent on weed species present in the test area; however, a combination of trifluralin and niclofen gave a broader spectrum of control and better crop yields than either used alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed removal delayed four weeks significantly reduced marketable and total root yields relative to season-long weed-free plots.

Treatment
Delaying weed removal for 4 wk after crop emergencee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
yields of marketable and total rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
plots kept weed-free all seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying weed removal for 4 wk after crop emergence significantly reduced yields of marketable and total roots compared with plots kept weed-free all season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“RUTABAGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding later than four weeks caused progressively larger yield reductions.

Treatment
Delayed weeding beyond 4 wke0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
4 wke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delayed weeding beyond 4 wk resulted in progressively greater reductions in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“RUTABAGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly weeding for two, four, six or eight weeks gave yields comparable to season-long weed-free conditions.

Treatment
once-weekly weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
those kept weed-free all seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rutabagas kept weed-free for 2, 4, 6, and 8 wk from crop emergence by once-weekly weeding gave yields comparable to those kept weed-free all season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides without hand-weeding yielded significantly less than herbicides with one hand-weeding.

Treatment
Herbicide treatments without hand-weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
those with one hand-weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatments without hand-weeding gave significantly lower yields than those with one hand-weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“RUTABAGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three hand-weedings with herbicides were not significantly better than one hand-weeding with herbicides.

Treatment
three hand-weedings with herbicidese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
not significantly bettere0
Comparator
herbicides with one hand-weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of three hand-weedings with herbicides was not significantly better than herbicides with one hand-weeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“RUTABAGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The degree of weed control depended on weed species in the test area.

Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
Level of weed controle0
Setting
test areae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Level of weed control was dependent on weed species present in the test area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“RUTABAGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined trifluralin and niclofen controlled a broader weed spectrum than either alone.

Treatment
a combination of trifluralin and niclofene0
Interactor
weede1weede0
Outcome
broader spectrum of controle0
Direction
broadere0
Comparator
either used alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of trifluralin and niclofen gave a broader spectrum of control and better crop yields than either used alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Level of weed control was dependent on weed species present in the test area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“RUTABAGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined trifluralin and niclofen produced better crop yields than either alone.

Treatment
a combination of trifluralin and niclofene0
Interactor
weede1weede0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
either used alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus subsp. rapifera
Brassica napus subsp. rapifera · TaxonPicasa user Seedambassadors · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of trifluralin and niclofen gave a broader spectrum of control and better crop yields than either used alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Level of weed control was dependent on weed species present in the test area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“RUTABAGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

trifluralin · control · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

51 papers: 32 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.