Paper · 2010 · International Journal of Food Properties

Determination of Tangerine Volume Using Image Processing Methods

Mostafa Khojastehnazhand; Mahmoud Omid; Ahmad Tabatabaeefar

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, two image processing techniques; namely, segmentation and ellipsoid approximation, were used to estimate the volume of tangerines. The proposed system consisted of two CCD cameras, capture cards, an appropriate lighting system and a computer. The paired t-test showed the estimated volume using segmentation method was not significantly different from the volume determined by water displacement method (p > 0.05). The difference between the volumes estimated by ellipsoid approximation and water displacement method was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Bland–Altman approach showed the size of tangerines has no effect on the accuracy of volume estimation by segmentation method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Segmentation volume estimates did not differ significantly from water displacement measurements.

Outcome
estimated volumee0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Qualifier
p > 0.05e0
Comparator
water displacement methode0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“estimated volume using segmentation method was not significantly different from the volume determined by water displacement method (p > 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–428 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ellipsoid approximation volume estimates differed significantly from water displacement.

Outcome
volumes estimated by ellipsoid approximatione0
Qualifier
P < 0.05e0
Comparator
water displacement methode0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The difference between the volumes estimated by ellipsoid approximation and water displacement method was statistically significant (P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–573 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tangerine size did not affect segmentation volume estimation accuracy.

Taxon
tangerinesCitrus reticulatae0
Outcome
accuracy of volume estimation by segmentation methode0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
size of tangerinese0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the size of tangerines has no effect on the accuracy of volume estimation by segmentation method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–704 · show in text ↑