Paper · 2010 · PLoS ONE

Interaction of 8-Hydroxyquinoline with Soil Environment Mediates Its Ecological Function

Inderjit; Devika Bajpai; M. S. Rajeswari

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allelopathic functions of plant-released chemicals are often studied through growth bioassays assuming that these chemicals will directly impact plant growth. This overlooks the role of soil factors in mediating allelopathic activities of chemicals, particularly non-volatiles. Here we examined the allelopathic potential of 8-hydroxyquinoline (HQ), a chemical reported to be exuded from the roots of Centaurea diffusa. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Growth bioassays and HQ recovery experiments were performed in HQ-treated soils (non-sterile, sterile, organic matter-enriched and glucose-amended) and untreated control soil. Root growth of either Brassica campestris or Phalaris minor was not affected in HQ-treated non-sterile soil. Soil modifications (organic matter and glucose amendments) could not enhance the recovery of HQ in soil, which further supports the observation that HQ is not likely to be an allelopathic compound. Hydroxyquinoline-treated soil had lower values for the CO(2) release compared to untreated non-sterile soil. Soil sterilization significantly influenced the organic matter content, PO(4)-P and total organic nitrogen levels. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Here, we concluded that evaluation of the effect of a chemical on plant growth is not enough in evaluating the ecological role of a chemical in plant-plant interactions. Interaction of the chemical with soil factors largely determines the impact of HQ on plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth of Brassica campestris was not affected in HQ-treated non-sterile soil.

Taxon
Brassica campestrisBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferae1
Treatment
HQ-treated non-sterile soile1
Outcome
Root growthe1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Root growth of either Brassica campestris or Phalaris minor was not affected in HQ-treated non-sterile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth of Phalaris minor was not affected in HQ-treated non-sterile soil.

Taxon
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore1
Treatment
HQ-treated non-sterile soile1
Outcome
Root growthe1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Root growth of either Brassica campestris or Phalaris minor was not affected in HQ-treated non-sterile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil modifications with organic matter and glucose could not enhance recovery of HQ in soil.

Treatment
Soil modifications (organic matter and glucose amendments)e2
Outcome
recovery of HQ in soile2
Direction
could not enhancee2

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e2

“Soil modifications (organic matter and glucose amendments) could not enhance the recovery of HQ in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–852 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HQ is probably not an allelopathic compound, according to the authors.

Taxon
Centaurea diffusaCentaurea diffusae1
Compound
HQe2
Outcome
allelopathic compounde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Centaurea diffusa
Centaurea diffusa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNorman E. Rees, USDA Agricultural Research Service - Retired, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Here we examined the allelopathic potential of 8-hydroxyquinoline (HQ), a chemical reported to be exuded from the roots of Centaurea diffusa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–430 · show in text ↑
e2

“which further supports the observation that HQ is not likely to be an allelopathic compound”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroxyquinoline-treated soil had lower CO2 release than untreated non-sterile soil.

Treatment
Hydroxyquinoline-treated soile1
Outcome
CO(2) releasee1
Direction
lower valuese1
Comparator
untreated non-sterile soile1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“Hydroxyquinoline-treated soil had lower values for the CO(2) release compared to untreated non-sterile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1054 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sterilization significantly influenced organic matter content, PO4-P and total organic nitrogen levels.

Treatment
Soil sterilizatione1
Outcome
organic matter content, PO(4)-P and total organic nitrogen levelse1

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Soil sterilization significantly influenced the organic matter content, PO(4)-P and total organic nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1169 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Evaluating a chemical only by its effect on plant growth is not enough to judge its ecological role.

Outcome
evaluation of the effect of a chemical on plant growth is not enoughe1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“evaluation of the effect of a chemical on plant growth is not enough in evaluating the ecological role of a chemical in plant-plant interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1364 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction of HQ with soil factors largely determines its impact on plant growth.

Treatment
Interaction of the chemical with soil factorse1
Outcome
impact of HQ on plant growthe1
Direction
largely determinese1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“Interaction of the chemical with soil factors largely determines the impact of HQ on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1463 · show in text ↑