Paper · 2008 · Plant Disease

Agronomic and Economic Responses of Spring Wheat to Management of Fusarium Head Blight

C. R. Hollingsworth; C. D. Motteberg; J. V. Wiersma; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop losses in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and North Dakota caused by Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics incited by Fusarium graminearum are common. Fungicide application is often recommended when environments promote disease development but benefits have not been fully evaluated when environment, cultivar resistance, and economic outcome are considered. Agronomic and economic characters were determined for cultivars with various resistance levels when treated with no fungicide; propiconazole at 63 g active ingredient (a.i.)/ha applied at Feekes growth stage (FGS) 2, tebuconazole at 126 g a.i./ha applied at FGS 10.51, or propiconazole at 63 g a.i./ha applied at FGS 2 followed by tebuconazole at 126 g a.i./ha applied at FGS 10.51. Revenue returned from FHB moderately susceptible (MS) cultivars was 8% greater than moderately resistant (MR) cultivars in low-disease environs but differences were not significant when disease was moderate. Deoxynivalenol accumulation in grain of MS and MR cultivars was unchanged by fungicide treatment. MS cultivars were economically more adventitious to grow than MR cultivars in both disease environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Revenue from moderately susceptible cultivars was 8% greater than from moderately resistant cultivars in low-disease environments

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
moderately susceptible (MS) cultivarse1
Outcome
Revenue returned from FHBe1
Direction
greatere1
Value
8%e1
Comparator
moderately resistant (MR) cultivarse1
Setting
low-disease environse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop losses in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and North Dakota caused by Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics incited by Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Revenue returned from FHB moderately susceptible (MS) cultivars was 8% greater than moderately resistant (MR) cultivars in low-disease environs but differences were not significant when disease was moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–987 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Revenue differences between susceptible and resistant cultivars were not significant when disease was moderate

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
Revenue returned from FHBe1
Direction
not significante1
Comparator
moderately resistant (MR) cultivarse1
Setting
when disease was moderatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop losses in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and North Dakota caused by Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics incited by Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Revenue returned from FHB moderately susceptible (MS) cultivars was 8% greater than moderately resistant (MR) cultivars in low-disease environs but differences were not significant when disease was moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deoxynivalenol accumulation in grain of MS and MR cultivars was unchanged by fungicide treatment

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
MS and MR cultivarse2
Organ / stage
graine2
Treatment
fungicide treatmente2
Outcome
Deoxynivalenol accumulatione2
Direction
unchangede2
Comparator
no fungicidee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop losses in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and North Dakota caused by Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics incited by Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e2

“Deoxynivalenol accumulation in grain of MS and MR cultivars was unchanged by fungicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1085 · show in text ↑
e4

“Agronomic and economic characters were determined for cultivars with various resistance levels when treated with no fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–523 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS cultivars were reported as economically more adventitious to grow than MR cultivars in both disease environments

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
MS cultivarse3
Outcome
economically more adventitious to growe3
Direction
more adventitiouse3
Comparator
MR cultivarse3
Setting
both disease environmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop losses in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and North Dakota caused by Fusarium head blight (FHB) epidemics incited by Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“MS cultivars were economically more adventitious to grow than MR cultivars in both disease environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1190 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 135 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.