Paper · 2012 · Applied and Environmental Soil Science

Oilseed Meal Effects on the Emergence and Survival of Crop and Weed Species

Katie L. Rothlisberger; Frank M. Hons; Terry J. Gentry; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Oilseed crops are being widely evaluated for potential biodiesel production. Seed meal (SM) remaining after extracting oil may have use as bioherbicides or organic fertilizers. Brassicaceae SM often contains glucosinolates that hydrolyze into biologically active compounds that may inhibit various pests. Jatropha curcas SM contains curcin, a phytoxin. A 14-day greenhouse study determined that Sinapis alba (white mustard), Brassica juncea (Indian mustard), Camelina sativa , and Jatropha curcas applied to soil at varying application rates [0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5% (w/w)] and incubation times (1, 7, and 14 d) prior to planting affected seed emergence and seedling survival of cotton [ Gossypium hirsutum (L.)], sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], johnsongrass ( Sorghum halepense ), and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus ). With each species, emergence and survival was most decreased by 2.5% SM application applied at 1 and 7 d incubations. White mustard SM incubated for 1 d applied at low and high rates had similar negative effects on johnsongrass seedlings. Redroot pigweed seedling survival was generally most decreased by all 2.5% SM applications. Based on significant effects determined by ANOVA, results suggested that the type, rate, and timing of SM application should be considered before land-applying SMs in cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed meal applied at 2.5% most decreased cotton seedling emergence and survival in the greenhouse.

Treatment
2.5% SM applicatione2
Outcome
emergence and survivale2
Direction
most decreasede2
Qualifier
applied at 1 and 7 d incubationse2
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“affected seed emergence and seedling survival of cotton [ Gossypium hirsutum (L.)], sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], johnsongrass ( Sorghum halepense ), and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–834 · show in text ↑
e2

“With each species, emergence and survival was most decreased by 2.5% SM application applied at 1 and 7 d incubations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–952 · show in text ↑
e3

“A 14-day greenhouse study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed meal applied at 2.5% most decreased sorghum seedling emergence and survival in the greenhouse.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
2.5% SM applicatione2
Outcome
emergence and survivale2
Direction
most decreasede2
Qualifier
applied at 1 and 7 d incubationse2
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“affected seed emergence and seedling survival of cotton [ Gossypium hirsutum (L.)], sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], johnsongrass ( Sorghum halepense ), and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–834 · show in text ↑
e2

“With each species, emergence and survival was most decreased by 2.5% SM application applied at 1 and 7 d incubations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–952 · show in text ↑
e3

“A 14-day greenhouse study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed meal applied at 2.5% most decreased johnsongrass emergence and survival in the greenhouse.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee1
Treatment
2.5% SM applicatione2
Outcome
emergence and survivale2
Direction
most decreasede2
Qualifier
applied at 1 and 7 d incubationse2
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“affected seed emergence and seedling survival of cotton [ Gossypium hirsutum (L.)], sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], johnsongrass ( Sorghum halepense ), and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–834 · show in text ↑
e2

“With each species, emergence and survival was most decreased by 2.5% SM application applied at 1 and 7 d incubations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–952 · show in text ↑
e3

“A 14-day greenhouse study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed meal applied at 2.5% most decreased redroot pigweed emergence and survival in the greenhouse.

Taxon
redroot pigweede1
Treatment
2.5% SM applicatione2
Outcome
emergence and survivale2
Direction
most decreasede2
Qualifier
applied at 1 and 7 d incubationse2
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“affected seed emergence and seedling survival of cotton [ Gossypium hirsutum (L.)], sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], johnsongrass ( Sorghum halepense ), and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–834 · show in text ↑
e2

“With each species, emergence and survival was most decreased by 2.5% SM application applied at 1 and 7 d incubations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–952 · show in text ↑
e3

“A 14-day greenhouse study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White mustard seed meal incubated for 1 d had similar negative effects on johnsongrass seedlings at low and high rates.

Taxon
johnsongrassSorghum halepensee5
Treatment
White mustard SMe5
Outcome
seedlingse5
Direction
similar negative effectse5
Qualifier
incubated for 1 d applied at low and high ratese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · TaxonMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“White mustard SM incubated for 1 d applied at low and high rates had similar negative effects on johnsongrass seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.5% seed meal applications generally most decreased redroot pigweed seedling survival.

Taxon
redroot pigweede4
Treatment
2.5% SM applicationse4
Outcome
seedling survivale4
Direction
most decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Redroot pigweed seedling survival was generally most decreased by all 2.5% SM applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1165 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering type, rate and timing of seed meal application before land-applying seed meals in cropping systems.

Taxon
Crop and Weed Speciest0
Outcome
land-applying SMs in cropping systemse6
Qualifier
type, rate, and timing of SM application should be considerede6

Verbatim

t0

“Crop and Weed Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“results suggested that the type, rate, and timing of SM application should be considered before land-applying SMs in cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1350 · show in text ↑