Paper · 1993 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Determination of wheat nitrogen status with a hand‐held chlorophyll meter: Influence of management practices1

D. W. Reeves; P. L. Mask; C. W. Wood; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
133
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The nitrogen (N) status of wheat at specific growth stages has potential in predicting yield goals and supplemental N fertilizer requirements but there is a need for a simple and reliable method for field determination of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) N status under different management schemes. This field study was conducted for two seasons (1989–90 and 1990–91) on a Norfolk sl (fine‐loamy, siliceous thermic Typic Kandiudults) in east‐central Alabama. Treatment variables were tillage, fungicide and N rate. Tillage treatments were disk/harrow or paraplow. Fungicide treatments were no fungicide or propiconazole (Tilt®) applied at Feekes growth stage (GS) 8. Nitrogen rates were a 0‐N control and 45, 90, 134, or 179 kg N/ha applied in a two‐way split with 22.5 kg N/ha applied at planting and the remainder applied in mid‐February. Whole plant samples at GS 3 and 5, and flag leaf samples at GS 10.51 were analyzed for N; a hand‐held meter was used to measure chlorophyll concentrations at these sampling times also. The most consistent yield response was to fungicide, especially at higher N rates, with increases ranging from 15 to 62%. Paraplowing also affected grain yield response to N application. Leaf chlorophyll meter readings were significantly correlated to tissue N concentration and grain yield. The best predictor of grain yield was N uptake at GS 5, however, multiple regression models that included chlorophyll meter readings and dry matter at GS 5 were comparable to N uptake as predictors of yield. Chlorophyll meter readings have potential to be combined with other simple measurements, e.g., dry matter determination and/or soil nitrate tests, to develop quick and reliable methods for predicting N fertilizer requirements for winter wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide raised yield by 15 to 62%, particularly at higher nitrogen rates.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
15 to 62%e0
Qualifier
higher N ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most consistent yield response was to fungicide, especially at higher N rates, with increases ranging from 15 to 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraplowing affected the grain yield response to nitrogen.

Treatment
Paraplowinge0
Outcome
grain yield responsee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paraplowing also affected grain yield response to N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings correlated significantly with tissue nitrogen concentration.

Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
tissue N concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll meter readings were significantly correlated to tissue N concentration and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings correlated significantly with grain yield.

Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll meter readings were significantly correlated to tissue N concentration and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake at GS 5 was the best grain yield predictor.

Outcome
predictor of grain yielde0
Comparator
N uptake at GS 5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best predictor of grain yield was N uptake at GS 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Models combining chlorophyll readings and dry matter at GS 5 were comparable to nitrogen uptake for yield prediction.

Outcome
predictors of yielde0
Comparator
N uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multiple regression models that included chlorophyll meter readings and dry matter at GS 5 were comparable to N uptake as predictors of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed combining meter readings with dry matter or soil nitrate tests to predict fertilizer needs.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
predicting N fertilizer requirementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll meter readings have potential to be combined with other simple measurements, e.g., dry matter determination and/or soil nitrate tests, to develop quick and reliable methods for predicting N fertilizer requirements for winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1774 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.