Paper · 2013 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Influence of Garlic Intercropping or Active Emitted Volatiles in Releasers on Aphid and Related Beneficial in Wheat Fields in China

Hai-bo ZHOU; Ju-lian CHEN; Yong LIU; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In order to develop biological control of aphids by a “push-pull” approach, intercropping using repellent emitting plants was developed in different crop and associated plant models. Garlic is one of the potential plant that could be inserted in crops to decrease the pest occurrence in neighboring crop plots. In this study, field works were conducted in wheat fields in Langfang Experimental Station, Hebei Province in China from October 2009 to July 2010 during wheat developmental season. The effect of wheat intercropping with garlic but also the volatiles emission on the incidence of the English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae Fabricius (Homoptera: Aphididae) was assessed. Natural beneficial occurrence and global yields in two winter wheat varieties that were susceptible or resistant to cereal aphid were also determined comparing to control plots without the use of garlic plant intercrop nor semiochemical releaser in the fields. S. avenae was found to be lower in garlic oil blend treatment (GOB), diallyl disulfide treatment (DD) and wheat-garlic intercropping treatment (WGI) when compared to the control plots for both two varieties (P<0.01). Both intercropping and application of volatile chemicals emitted by garlic could improve the population densities of natural enemies of cereal aphid, including ladybeetles and mummified aphids. Ladybeetle population density in WGI, GOB and mummified aphids densities in WGI, DD were significantly higher than those in control fields for both two varieties (P<0.05). There were significant interactions between cultivars and treatments to the population densities of S. avenae. The 1 000-grain weight and yield of wheat were also increased compared to the control. Due to their potential alternatives as a biological control agent against cereal aphid, garlic intercropping and related emitted volatiles are expected to contribute to the further improvement of integrated pest management systems and to potentially reduce the amount of traditional synthetic pesticides applied in wheat fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic oil blend lowered Sitobion avenae in both wheat varieties relative to controls.

Treatment
garlic oil blend treatment (GOB)e0
Interactor
S. avenaeSitobion avenaee0pest
Outcome
S. avenaee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitobion avenae
Sitobion avenae · InteractorBildoj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. avenae was found to be lower in garlic oil blend treatment (GOB), diallyl disulfide treatment (DD) and wheat-garlic intercropping treatment (WGI) when compared to the control plots for both two varieties (P<0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diallyl disulfide lowered Sitobion avenae in both wheat varieties relative to controls.

Treatment
diallyl disulfide treatment (DD)e0
Interactor
S. avenaeSitobion avenaee0pest
Outcome
S. avenaee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitobion avenae
Sitobion avenae · InteractorBildoj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. avenae was found to be lower in garlic oil blend treatment (GOB), diallyl disulfide treatment (DD) and wheat-garlic intercropping treatment (WGI) when compared to the control plots for both two varieties (P<0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-garlic intercropping lowered Sitobion avenae in both wheat varieties relative to controls.

Treatment
wheat-garlic intercropping treatment (WGI)e0
Interactor
S. avenaeSitobion avenaee0pest
Outcome
S. avenaee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitobion avenae
Sitobion avenae · InteractorBildoj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. avenae was found to be lower in garlic oil blend treatment (GOB), diallyl disulfide treatment (DD) and wheat-garlic intercropping treatment (WGI) when compared to the control plots for both two varieties (P<0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased natural enemies of cereal aphid.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Interactor
cereal aphide0pest
Outcome
population densities of natural enemies of cereal aphide0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both intercropping and application of volatile chemicals emitted by garlic could improve the population densities of natural enemies of cereal aphid, including ladybeetles and mummified aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic volatiles increased natural enemies of cereal aphid.

Treatment
application of volatile chemicals emitted by garlice0
Interactor
cereal aphide0pest
Outcome
population densities of natural enemies of cereal aphide0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both intercropping and application of volatile chemicals emitted by garlic could improve the population densities of natural enemies of cereal aphid, including ladybeetles and mummified aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ladybeetle density was higher under wheat-garlic intercropping than in controls.

Treatment
WGIe0
Interactor
Ladybeetlee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Ladybeetle population densitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ladybeetle population density in WGI, GOB and mummified aphids densities in WGI, DD were significantly higher than those in control fields for both two varieties (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ladybeetle density was higher under garlic oil blend than in controls.

Treatment
GOBe0
Interactor
Ladybeetlee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Ladybeetle population densitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ladybeetle population density in WGI, GOB and mummified aphids densities in WGI, DD were significantly higher than those in control fields for both two varieties (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mummified aphid density was higher under wheat-garlic intercropping than in controls.

Treatment
WGIe0
Interactor
mummified aphidse0pest
Outcome
mummified aphids densitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ladybeetle population density in WGI, GOB and mummified aphids densities in WGI, DD were significantly higher than those in control fields for both two varieties (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mummified aphid density was higher under diallyl disulfide than in controls.

Treatment
DDe0
Interactor
mummified aphidse0pest
Outcome
mummified aphids densitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ladybeetle population density in WGI, GOB and mummified aphids densities in WGI, DD were significantly higher than those in control fields for both two varieties (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and treatment interacted significantly in aphid population density.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Interactor
S. avenaeSitobion avenaee0pest
Outcome
population densities of S. avenaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitobion avenae
Sitobion avenae · InteractorBildoj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant interactions between cultivars and treatments to the population densities of S. avenae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased wheat 1 000-grain weight relative to controls.

Outcome
1 000-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1 000-grain weight and yield of wheat were also increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased wheat yield relative to controls.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1 000-grain weight and yield of wheat were also increased compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect garlic intercropping and emitted volatiles to improve integrated pest management and potentially reduce synthetic pesticide use.

Outcome
improvement of integrated pest management systemse0
Qualifier
potentially reduce the amount of traditional synthetic pesticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic intercropping and related emitted volatiles are expected to contribute to the further improvement of integrated pest management systems and to potentially reduce the amount of traditional synthetic pesticides applied in wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–2048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–122 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · Sitobion avenae · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

intercropping · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.