Paper · 1992 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Competition among Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli strains for nodulation of common bean

Maria Luz C. George; Françoise M. Robert

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Six effective Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli strains were examined for nodulation competitiveness on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), using all possible two-strain combinations of inoculum. Nodule occupancy was determined with strain-specific fluorescent antibodies. The strains were divided into three groups according to their overall competitive abilities on pole bean cv. Kentucky Wonder and bush bean cv. Bountiful. Strains TAL 182 and TAL 1472 were highly competitive (greater than 70% nodule occupancy); strains KIM-5, Viking 1, and CIAT 899 were moderately competitive (approximately 50% nodule occupancy); and strain CIAT 632 was poorly competitive (less than 5% nodule occupancy). The competitiveness of the six strains was similar on the two host cultivars. The proportion of competing strains in the inoculum influenced the nodule occupancy of the highly competitive and moderately competitive strains, but not that of the poorly competitive strain. Two outstanding strains (TAL 182 and TAL 1472) were identified as ideal model strains for molecular and genetic studies on nodulation competitiveness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strains TAL 182 and TAL 1472 were highly competitive for nodulation of common bean, with greater than 70% nodule occupancy.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
TAL 182e0symbiont
Second interactor
TAL 1472e0symbiont
Outcome
nodule occupancye0
Value
greater than 70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strains TAL 182 and TAL 1472 were highly competitive (greater than 70% nodule occupancy)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strains KIM-5, Viking 1 and CIAT 899 were moderately competitive for nodulation of common bean, with approximately 50% nodule occupancy.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
KIM-5e0symbiont
Second interactor
Viking 1e0symbiont
Outcome
nodule occupancye0
Value
approximately 50%e0
Qualifier
CIAT 899e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains KIM-5, Viking 1, and CIAT 899 were moderately competitive (approximately 50% nodule occupancy)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain CIAT 632 was poorly competitive for nodulation of common bean, with less than 5% nodule occupancy.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
CIAT 632e0symbiont
Outcome
nodule occupancye0
Value
less than 5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain CIAT 632 was poorly competitive (less than 5% nodule occupancy)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The competitiveness of the six strains was similar on the two host cultivars.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
two host cultivarse0
Outcome
competitivenesse0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The competitiveness of the six strains was similar on the two host cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proportion of competing strains in the inoculum influenced the nodule occupancy of the highly and moderately competitive strains.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
proportion of competing strains in the inoculume0
Outcome
nodule occupancye0
Qualifier
highly competitive and moderately competitive strainse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of competing strains in the inoculum influenced the nodule occupancy of the highly competitive and moderately competitive strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proportion of competing strains in the inoculum did not influence the nodule occupancy of the poorly competitive strain.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
proportion of competing strains in the inoculume0
Outcome
nodule occupancye0
Qualifier
poorly competitive straine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of competing strains in the inoculum influenced the nodule occupancy of the highly competitive and moderately competitive strains, but not that of the poorly competitive strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified strains TAL 182 and TAL 1472 as ideal model strains for molecular and genetic studies on nodulation competitiveness.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
ideal model strains for molecular and genetic studies on nodulation competitivenesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two outstanding strains (TAL 182 and TAL 1472) were identified as ideal model strains for molecular and genetic studies on nodulation competitiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–92 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.