Paper · 2014 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Identification of predictor parameters to determine agro‐industrial compost suppressiveness against Fusarium oxysporum and Phytophthora capsici diseases in muskmelon and pepper seedlings

Josefa Blaya; Eva Lloret; Margarita Ros; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of reliable prediction tools for evaluation of the level and specificity of compost suppressiveness limits its application. In our study, different chemical, biological and microbiological parameters were used to evaluate their potential use as a predictor parameter for the suppressive effect of composts against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (FOM) and Phytophthora capsici (P. capsici) in muskmelon and pepper seedlings respectively. Composts were obtained from artichoke sludge, chopped vineyard pruning waste and various agro-industrial wastes (C1: blanched artichokes; C2: garlic waste; C3: dry olive cake). RESULTS: Compost C3 proved to offer the highest level of resistance against FOM, and compost C2 the highest level of resistance against P. capsici. Analysis of phospholipid fatty acids isolated from compost revealed that the three composts showed different microbial community structures. Protease, NAGase and chitinase activities were significantly higher in compost C3, as was dehydrogenase activity in compost C2. CONCLUSION: The use of specific parameters such as general (dehydrogenase activity) and specific enzymatic activities (protease, NAGase and chitinase activities) may be useful to predict compost suppressiveness against both pathogens. The selection of raw materials for agro-industrial composts is important in controlling Fusarium wilt and Phytophthora root rot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost C3 gave the highest resistance against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis in muskmelon seedlings.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe1
Treatment
Compost C3e0
Interactor
FOMe0pathogen
Outcome
resistance against FOMe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost C3 proved to offer the highest level of resistance against FOM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–717 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis (FOM) and Phytophthora capsici (P. capsici) in muskmelon and pepper seedlings respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost C2 gave the highest resistance against Phytophthora capsici in pepper seedlings.

Taxon
peppere1
Treatment
compost C2e0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Outcome
resistance against P. capsicie0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost C2 the highest level of resistance against P. capsici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phytophthora capsici (P. capsici) in muskmelon and pepper seedlings respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three composts had different microbial community structures.

Taxon
muskmelon and pepper seedlingst0
Outcome
different microbial community structurese0

Verbatim

e0

“the three composts showed different microbial community structures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon and pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 156–186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protease, NAGase, and chitinase activities were significantly higher in compost C3.

Taxon
muskmelon and pepper seedlingst0
Material
compost C3e0
Outcome
Protease, NAGase and chitinase activitiese0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Protease, NAGase and chitinase activities were significantly higher in compost C3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon and pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 156–186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydrogenase activity was significantly higher in compost C2.

Taxon
muskmelon and pepper seedlingst0
Material
compost C2e0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activitye0
Direction
highere1

Verbatim

e0

“as was dehydrogenase activity in compost C2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1053 · show in text ↑
e1

“Protease, NAGase and chitinase activities were significantly higher in compost C3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon and pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 156–186 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest enzyme activities as predictors of compost suppression against both pathogens.

Taxon
muskmelon and pepper seedlingst0
Outcome
predict compost suppressiveness against both pathogense0

Verbatim

e0

“general (dehydrogenase activity) and specific enzymatic activities (protease, NAGase and chitinase activities) may be useful to predict compost suppressiveness against both pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon and pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 156–186 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting agro-industrial compost raw materials is important for controlling Fusarium wilt and Phytophthora root rot.

Taxon
muskmelon and pepper seedlingst0
Outcome
controlling Fusarium wilt and Phytophthora root rote0

Verbatim

e0

“The selection of raw materials for agro-industrial composts is important in controlling Fusarium wilt and Phytophthora root rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon and pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 156–186 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.