Abstract
The experiment was conducted at the experimental field of Entomology Division, BARI, Gazipur during Rabi 2007-08. Two microbial insecticides HaNPV @ 0.4ml/L and Bt @ 2g/L along with their combination were tested against H. armigera. The lowest fruit infestation, both in number and weight, was obtained from treatment HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (11.78%, 9.64%), followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%). The highest fruit yield (16.92 t/ha) was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying plots followed by Bt (16.65 t/ha) and HaNPV (14.73 t/ha). In case of MBCR, the highest MBCR was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (5.30) followed by HaNPV (4.46) and Bt (3.37). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/agric.v12i1.19583 The Agriculturists 2014; 12(1) 68-74
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate HaNPV and Bt spraying produced the lowest fruit infestation by number, 11.78%.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- HaNPV and Bt alternate sprayinge0
- Outcome
- fruit infestation, both in numbere0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 11.78%e0
- Comparator
- Bte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest fruit infestation, both in number and weight, was obtained from treatment HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (11.78%, 9.64%), followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%).”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate HaNPV and Bt spraying produced the lowest fruit infestation by weight, 9.64%.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- HaNPV and Bt alternate sprayinge0
- Outcome
- fruit infestation, both in number and weighte0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 9.64%e0
- Comparator
- Bte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest fruit infestation, both in number and weight, was obtained from treatment HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (11.78%, 9.64%), followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%).”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt spraying gave 13.25% fruit infestation by number.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Bte0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione1
- Value
- 13.25%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
e1“The lowest fruit infestation, both in number and weight, was obtained from treatment HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (11.78%, 9.64%), followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt spraying gave 10.85% fruit infestation by weight.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Bte0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione1
- Value
- 10.85%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
e1“The lowest fruit infestation, both in number and weight, was obtained from treatment HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (11.78%, 9.64%), followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%).”
Claim · model-written summary
HaNPV spraying gave 17.67% fruit infestation by number.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- HaNPVe0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione1
- Value
- 17.67%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
e1“The lowest fruit infestation, both in number and weight, was obtained from treatment HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (11.78%, 9.64%), followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%).”
Claim · model-written summary
HaNPV spraying gave 13.11% fruit infestation by weight.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- HaNPVe0
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione1
- Value
- 13.11%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
e1“The lowest fruit infestation, both in number and weight, was obtained from treatment HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (11.78%, 9.64%), followed by Bt (13.25%, 10.85%) and HaNPV (17.67%, 13.11%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate spraying produced the highest fruit yield, 16.92 t/ha.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- HaNPV and Bt alternate sprayinge0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 16.92 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest fruit yield (16.92 t/ha) was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying plots followed by Bt (16.65 t/ha) and HaNPV (14.73 t/ha).”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt plots yielded 16.65 t/ha.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Bte0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Value
- 16.65 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit yield (16.92 t/ha) was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying plots followed by Bt (16.65 t/ha) and HaNPV (14.73 t/ha)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
Claim · model-written summary
HaNPV plots yielded 14.73 t/ha.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- HaNPVe0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Value
- 14.73 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit yield (16.92 t/ha) was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying plots followed by Bt (16.65 t/ha) and HaNPV (14.73 t/ha)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate spraying had the highest MBCR, 5.30.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- HaNPV and Bt alternate sprayinge0
- Outcome
- MBCRe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.30e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest MBCR was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (5.30) followed by HaNPV (4.46) and Bt (3.37)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
Claim · model-written summary
HaNPV had MBCR 4.46.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- HaNPVe0
- Outcome
- MBCRe0
- Value
- 4.46e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MBCR was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (5.30) followed by HaNPV (4.46) and Bt (3.37)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bt had MBCR 3.37.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Bte0
- Outcome
- MBCRe0
- Value
- 3.37e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MBCR was obtained from HaNPV and Bt alternate spraying (5.30) followed by HaNPV (4.46) and Bt (3.37)”
t0“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”
The same questions in other papers
transgenic · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.