Paper · 1984 · Crop Science

Tillering Dynamics of Water Barley as Influenced by Cultivar and Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Field Study1

L. F. García del Moral; J. M. Ramos; L. Recalde

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A thorough knowledge of tiller development is essential in the analysis of grain production in most cultivated cereals, since the final number of ears produced by these plants is dependent on tillering. The object of this study was to investigate, under field conditions, the pattern of tillering, ear production, and survival of the component tillers in six barley cultivars: four six‐rowed ( Hordeum vulgare L.) and two two‐rowed ( H. distichon L.). The cultivars were grown in Granada, Spain, during 1980 and 1981 on a fine‐loamy, carbonatic, thermic, Calcixerollic Xerocrept soil, and each was subjected to two levels of N fertilizer(25 and 40 kg ha ‐1 ), both at seeding and as a top‐dressing. From the data collected on tiller development during this study, the existence of a critical survival height for tillers is postulated: tillers less than one‐third the height of the main stem at the end of shooting would fail to produce ears. The end of shooting corresponds to stages 8 and 9 of Feekes' scale when the last leaf or the ligule of the last leaf, respectively, is just visible. Nitrogen treatments at seeding, when added at maximum dosage, increased significantly both the number of tillers at the end of shooting (maximum increase = 21%) and the final number of tillers with ears (maximum increase = 31%), while the N treatments at topdressing (midway during shooting) did not affect the number of tillers at the end of shooting or at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillers below one-third of main stem height at the end of shooting were postulated to fail to produce ears.

Organ / stage
tillerse0
Outcome
fail to produce earse0
Qualifier
less than one‐third the height of the main stem at the end of shootinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillers less than one‐third the height of the main stem at the end of shooting would fail to produce ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“six barley cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum nitrogen dosage at seeding significantly raised tiller number at the end of shooting by up to 21%.

Treatment
Nitrogen treatments at seedinge0
Outcome
number of tillers at the end of shootinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen treatments at seeding, when added at maximum dosage, increased significantly both the number of tillers at the end of shooting (maximum increase = 21%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1251 · show in text ↑
e1

“six barley cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum nitrogen dosage at seeding significantly raised final tillers with ears by up to 31%.

Treatment
Nitrogen treatments at seedinge0
Outcome
final number of tillers with earse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen treatments at seeding, when added at maximum dosage, increased significantly both the number of tillers at the end of shooting (maximum increase = 21%) and the final number of tillers with ears (maximum increase = 31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“six barley cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing did not affect tiller number at the end of shooting or harvest.

Treatment
N treatments at topdressinge0
Outcome
number of tillers at the end of shooting or at harveste0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N treatments at topdressing (midway during shooting) did not affect the number of tillers at the end of shooting or at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1456 · show in text ↑
e1

“six barley cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–375 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 473 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.