Paper · 1996 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effectiveness of different sources of manganese foliar sprays in alleviating manganese deficiency ofLupinus angustifoliusL. grown on manganese deficient soils in western Australia

R.F. Brennam

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Responses of narrow‐leafed sweet lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) to foliar sprays of different sources of manganese (Mn) were compared in field experiments in three years at six sites in Western Australia. The relative effectiveness of manganese chelate (EDTA; 14% Mn) and manganese sulfate (25% Mn) applied as foliar sprays for alleviating Mn deficiency of lupins was assessed. Each source was sprayed at six levels of Mn (0, 0.125, 0.250, 0.50, 1.0, and 2 kg Mn/ha) when pods on the main stem were 2–3 cm long to define the relationship between seed and the amount of foliar Mn applied for lupins grown on Mn‐deficient soil. Manganese chelate, manganese sulfate, and the Mangasol sprays were equally effective. For all sources, 1.0 kg Mn/ha sprayed on the foliage was required to produce maximum seed yield and reduce split seed to an acceptable level (<4%). In all years, manganese sulfate banded with the seed produced similar seed yields as Mn sprayed on the foliage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese chelate, manganese sulfate and Mangasol sprays were equally effective.

Taxon
Lupinus angustifolius L.Lupinus angustifoliuse1
Treatment
Manganese chelatee0
Outcome
equally effectivee0
Direction
equally effectivee0
Comparator
manganese sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus angustifolius
Lupinus angustifolius · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese chelate, manganese sulfate, and the Mangasol sprays were equally effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“Responses of narrow‐leafed sweet lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) to foliar sprays of different sources of manganese (Mn) were compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across sources, 1.0 kg Mn/ha foliar application was required for maximum seed yield.

Taxon
Lupinus angustifolius L.Lupinus angustifoliuse1
Treatment
1.0 kg Mn/ha sprayed on the foliagee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.0 kg Mn/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus angustifolius
Lupinus angustifolius · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all sources, 1.0 kg Mn/ha sprayed on the foliage was required to produce maximum seed yield and reduce split seed to an acceptable level (<4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“Responses of narrow‐leafed sweet lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) to foliar sprays of different sources of manganese (Mn) were compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across sources, 1.0 kg Mn/ha foliar application reduced split seed below 4%.

Taxon
Lupinus angustifolius L.Lupinus angustifoliuse1
Treatment
1.0 kg Mn/ha sprayed on the foliagee0
Outcome
split seede0
Direction
reducee0
Value
<4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus angustifolius
Lupinus angustifolius · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all sources, 1.0 kg Mn/ha sprayed on the foliage was required to produce maximum seed yield and reduce split seed to an acceptable level (<4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“Responses of narrow‐leafed sweet lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) to foliar sprays of different sources of manganese (Mn) were compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded manganese sulfate produced seed yields similar to foliar manganese.

Taxon
Lupinus angustifolius L.Lupinus angustifoliuse1
Treatment
manganese sulfate banded with the seede0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
Mn sprayed on the foliagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus angustifolius
Lupinus angustifolius · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all years, manganese sulfate banded with the seed produced similar seed yields as Mn sprayed on the foliage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“Responses of narrow‐leafed sweet lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) to foliar sprays of different sources of manganese (Mn) were compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–145 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Lupinus angustifolius (narrow-leaved blue lupine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Lupinus angustifolius (narrow-leaved blue lupine)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.