Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Efficacy of a potential mycoherbicide for control of Alisma lanceolatum and Damasonium minus in Australian rice crops

EJ Cother; RL Gilbert

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Alisma lanceolatum (Alisma) is becoming a problem weed in NSW rice crops because it is invasive and tolerant of currently used herbicides. Darnasonium minus (starfruit), a widespread native, is a serious competitive weed in rice. The endemic fungus Rhynchosporiurn alismatis, which causes necrotic lesions on leaves and scapes of Alisma and starfruit, is being studied for potential development as a biological control agent for these weeds. Spray application of a conidial suspension to Alisma seedlings in the field at the 2-3 leaf stage, in 2 seasons, resulted in significant suppression of plant growth and markedly retarded development. Lesions developed on emergent leaves and caused premature death. In 1993 assessment of treatments 53 days after inoculation showed that although total leaf number per plant was reduced by 20%, total leaf dry weight was reduced by 34%, and root dry weight by 32%. Inflorescence development was also markedly reduced in both years; inflorescence number was reduced by an average of 77% in 1992-93 and by 52% in 1993-94. In 1994, inoculation reduced the dry weight of healthy leaves at 63 days after treatment by 49%, although root dry weight was not significantly reduced. Competition from a developing rice crop would be expected to reduce plant size and vigour further. Inoculation of glasshouse-grown starfruit seedlings produced similar trends. Spray-inoculation of seedlings 33 days after sowing resulted in 45% reduction in total plant biomass (dry weight, measured 64 days after inoculation) compared with 19 and 25% reduction in biomass in seedlings sprayed 23 and 50 days, respectively, after sowing. Inoculation of starfruit seedlings in the field significantly reduced biomass production by 21% and increased 6-fold the number of necrotic inflorescences. These experiments indicate that R. alismatis has potential for development as a mycoherbicide and a possible role in integrated control of these weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation significantly suppressed Alisma growth and development.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Treatment
Spray application of a conidial suspensione0
Outcome
plant growth and markedly retarded developmente0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray application of a conidial suspension to Alisma seedlings in the field at the 2-3 leaf stage, in 2 seasons, resulted in significant suppression of plant growth and markedly retarded development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesions developed and caused premature death after inoculation.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
Lesions developed on emergent leaves and caused premature deathe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesions developed on emergent leaves and caused premature death”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alisma leaf number fell 20%.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
total leaf number per plante0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total leaf number per plant was reduced by 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alisma leaf dry weight fell 34%.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
total leaf dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total leaf dry weight was reduced by 34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alisma root dry weight fell 32%.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
32%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight by 32%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alisma inflorescence development was markedly reduced.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
Inflorescence developmente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inflorescence development was also markedly reduced in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alisma inflorescence number fell 77% in 1992-93.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
inflorescence numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
77%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inflorescence number was reduced by an average of 77% in 1992-93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alisma inflorescence number fell 52% in 1993-94.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
52%e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
52%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and by 52% in 1993-94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced healthy leaf dry weight by 49% in 1994.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
dry weight of healthy leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation reduced the dry weight of healthy leaves at 63 days after treatment by 49%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight was not significantly reduced in 1994.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatumAlisma lanceolatumt0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
not significantly reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight was not significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starfruit biomass fell 45% for inoculation at 33 days.

Taxon
Damasonium minusDamasonium minust0
Treatment
Spray-inoculation of seedlings 33 days after sowinge0
Outcome
total plant biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Damasonium minus
Damasonium minus · TaxonMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray-inoculation of seedlings 33 days after sowing resulted in 45% reduction in total plant biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Damasonium minus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starfruit biomass fell 19% for inoculation at 23 days.

Taxon
Damasonium minusDamasonium minust0
Treatment
seedlings sprayed 23e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Damasonium minus
Damasonium minus · TaxonMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“19 and 25% reduction in biomass in seedlings sprayed 23 and 50 days, respectively, after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Damasonium minus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starfruit biomass fell 25% for inoculation at 50 days.

Taxon
Damasonium minusDamasonium minust0
Treatment
seedlings sprayed 23 and 50 dayse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Damasonium minus
Damasonium minus · TaxonMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25% reduction in biomass in seedlings sprayed 23 and 50 days, respectively, after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Damasonium minus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field inoculation reduced starfruit biomass 21%.

Taxon
Damasonium minusDamasonium minust0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Damasonium minus
Damasonium minus · TaxonMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of starfruit seedlings in the field significantly reduced biomass production by 21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Damasonium minus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field inoculation increased necrotic inflorescences sixfold.

Taxon
Damasonium minusDamasonium minust0
Outcome
number of necrotic inflorescencese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6-folde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Damasonium minus
Damasonium minus · TaxonMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased 6-fold the number of necrotic inflorescences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Damasonium minus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

R. alismatis has potential as a mycoherbicide.

Taxon
Alisma lanceolatum and Damasonium minusAlisma lanceolatumDamasonium minust0
Outcome
development as a mycoherbicide and a possible role in integrated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alisma lanceolatum
Alisma lanceolatum · TaxonGordon Leppig & Andrea J. Pickart · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Damasonium minus
Damasonium minus · TaxonMargaretRDonald · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. alismatis has potential for development as a mycoherbicide and a possible role in integrated control of these weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alisma lanceolatum and Damasonium minus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–92 · show in text ↑