Paper · 1972 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Transplanting and Plastic Cover on Growth of Sugar Beets1

M. A. Dillon; B. D. McCaslin; W. R. Schmehl

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Two field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of transplanting and plastic cover on the seasonal growth and yield of sugar beets ( Beta vulgaris L.). Both transplanting and plastic cover increased leaf areas in June and early July and increased final root yields. Earlier planting also increased early leaf areas and final root yields. The results showed that treatments increasing leaf area in June and early July increased final root yields, but differences in leaf area that occurred in August or later were not associated with differences in yields. Transplanting or plastic cover increased recoverable sucrose production as much as 44 to 48% over the conventionally planted sugar beets in 1968 and 26 to 27% in 1969. The advantages of these practices were greater for April than for May plantings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting increased sugar beet leaf area in June and early July.

Treatment
transplantinge0
Outcome
leaf arease0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
June and early Julye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both transplanting and plastic cover increased leaf areas in June and early July and increased final root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic cover increased sugar beet leaf area in June and early July.

Treatment
plastic covere0
Outcome
leaf arease0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
June and early Julye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both transplanting and plastic cover increased leaf areas in June and early July and increased final root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting increased final sugar beet root yield.

Treatment
transplantinge0
Outcome
final root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both transplanting and plastic cover increased leaf areas in June and early July and increased final root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic cover increased final sugar beet root yield.

Treatment
plastic covere0
Outcome
final root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both transplanting and plastic cover increased leaf areas in June and early July and increased final root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–286 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting increased early sugar beet leaf area and final root yield.

Treatment
Earlier plantinge0
Outcome
early leaf areas and final root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earlier planting also increased early leaf areas and final root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet leaf area increases in June and early July were associated with greater final root yield.

Treatment
treatments increasing leaf area in June and early Julye0
Outcome
final root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments increasing leaf area in June and early July increased final root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet leaf area differences in August or later were not associated with yield differences.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
differences in yieldse0
Qualifier
August or latere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in leaf area that occurred in August or later were not associated with differences in yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting or plastic cover increased recoverable sugar beet sucrose production by as much as 44 to 48% in 1968.

Treatment
Transplanting or plastic covere0
Outcome
recoverable sucrose productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44 to 48%e0
Qualifier
1968e0
Comparator
conventionally planted sugar beetse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transplanting or plastic cover increased recoverable sucrose production as much as 44 to 48% over the conventionally planted sugar beets in 1968”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting or plastic cover increased recoverable sugar beet sucrose production by 26 to 27% in 1969.

Treatment
Transplanting or plastic covere0
Outcome
recoverable sucrose productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26 to 27%e0
Qualifier
1969e0
Comparator
conventionally planted sugar beetse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transplanting or plastic cover increased recoverable sucrose production as much as 44 to 48% over the conventionally planted sugar beets in 1968 and 26 to 27% in 1969”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–744 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefits of transplanting or plastic cover were greater for April than May sugar beet planting.

Treatment
these practicese0
Outcome
advantagese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
May plantingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The advantages of these practices were greater for April than for May plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–66 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.