Paper · 2010 · Research in Plant Disease

Development of Effective Screening Method and Evaluation of Radish Cultivars for Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. raphani

Song-Yi Baik; Jin-Cheol Kim; Kyoung-Soo Jang; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

무 시들음병에 대한 저항성 검정법을 확립하기 위하여 접종 방법, 침지 시간, 접종원 농도 등의 발병 조건에 따른 '송백무'(감수성)와 '토광무'(중도저항성)의 무 시들음병 발생을 조사하였다. 이병토 접종법, 관주 접종법과 뿌리 침지법 등의 접종 방법에 따른 무 시들음병 발생을 실험한 결과, 이병토 접종법과 관주 접종법에 의해서는 무시들음병이 발생하지 않았다. 뿌리 침지법의 경우, 뿌리 상처 처리구는 무상처 처리구보다 무 시들음병이 더 많이 발생하였으며, 무상처 처리구에서 두 품종의 무 시들음병 발생은 차이를 나타냈다. 뿌리를 포자현탁액에 침지하는 시간(1시간~24시간)에 따른 무 시들음병 발생은 모든 처리구에서 높은 병 발생을 보였으며, 접종 시간이 증가하여도 무 시들음병 발생은 증가하지 않았다. 그러나 포자현탁액의 포자 농도가 증가함에 따라 무 시들음병 발생은 증가하였다. 위의 결과를 이용하여 시판 무 41종 품종의 시들음병 저항성 정도를 검정하였다. 온실에서 14일 재배한 무의 뿌리를 $1.0{\times}10^7$ conidia/ml의 포자현탁액에 2시간 동안 침지하여 실험한 결과, 6종 품종(15%)은 저항성, 22종 품종(53%)은 중도저항성 그리고 13종 품종(32%)은 감수성을 보였다. To establish the efficient screening method for resistance of radish to F. oxysporum f. sp. raphani, we investigated the development of Fusarium wilt of two radish cultivars, 'Songbaek' (susceptible) and 'Tokwang' (moderately resistant), according to several conditions such as inoculation methods, inoculum concentrations, and dipping periods of radish roots in spore suspension. By infected soil and soil-drenching inoculation methods, Fusarium wilt did not occur on the seedlings of both cultivars. In root dipping inoculation method using cut or non-cut roots of radish plants, the cut roots were easily infected by the pathogen than non-cut roots. And the disease development of two cultivars represented significant difference in non-cut root method. On the other hand, disease severity of Fusarium wilt on radish seedlings according to inoculum concentration increased in a dose-dependant manner, regardless of dipping periods. Using screening method established from the results, the 41 commercial radish cultivars were evaluated the degree of resistance to F. oxysporum f. sp. raphani. Among them, 6 radish cultivars were resistant, 22 cultivars were moderately resistant, and 13 cultivars were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected soil and soil drenching did not induce Fusarium wilt in either radish cultivar.

Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
infected soil and soil-drenching inoculation methodse0
Outcome
Fusarium wilte0
Direction
did not occure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By infected soil and soil-drenching inoculation methods, Fusarium wilt did not occur on the seedlings of both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cut radish roots were more readily infected than non-cut roots after root dipping.

Taxon
radish plantsRaphanus sativuse0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
cut rootse0
Outcome
infected by the pathogene0
Direction
easily infectede0
Comparator
non-cut rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In root dipping inoculation method using cut or non-cut roots of radish plants, the cut roots were easily infected by the pathogen than non-cut roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1276 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two radish cultivars differed significantly in disease development with non-cut root inoculation.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Treatment
non-cut root methode0
Outcome
disease developmente0
Comparator
two cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“the disease development of two cultivars represented significant difference in non-cut root method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1380 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish Fusarium wilt severity rose with inoculum concentration regardless of dipping time.

Taxon
radish seedlingsRaphanus sativuse0
Treatment
inoculum concentratione0
Outcome
disease severity of Fusarium wilte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
regardless of dipping periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease severity of Fusarium wilt on radish seedlings according to inoculum concentration increased in a dose-dependant manner, regardless of dipping periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1558 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six commercial radish cultivars were resistant to Fusarium wilt.

Outcome
resistante0
Value
6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 radish cultivars were resistant, 22 cultivars were moderately resistant, and 13 cultivars were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1857 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-two commercial radish cultivars were moderately resistant to Fusarium wilt.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Outcome
moderately resistante0
Value
22e0

Verbatim

e0

“22 cultivars were moderately resistant, and 13 cultivars were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1857 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirteen commercial radish cultivars were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Outcome
susceptible to Fusarium wilte0
Value
13e0

Verbatim

e0

“13 cultivars were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1857 · show in text ↑

infection · disease · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · disease · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.