Paper · 2002 · Journal of Herbs Spices & Medicinal Plants

Multidimensional Scaling for the Taxonomy of Papavereae

P. Tétényi; L. Füstös

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT To determine the relationship among the Papaveroideae, a data set, originally gathered for classification of the Papaveroideae using DNA restriction sites, was subjected to an multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis, leading to a more appropriate taxonomy of the Papavereae tribe (especially in Papaver, Stylomecon, and Roemeria genera). The spatial configuration of Papavereae was developed on the basis of absolute distances of taxa in relation to Papaver alpinum and made possible the 3D projection of the tribe. The configuration consisted of two different sets and provided a divergent rank image of taxa from the cladistic assumption. In one of these sets, taxa of Roemeria and the Papaver section Argemonidium, were not mixed, but formed two distinct groups in view of the genera. Papaver hybridum was the closest species to Roemeria, but Papaver pavoninum was the farthest and most distant taxon. In case of annual poppy species of the other set, the Papaver somniferum and Papaver macrostomum were not nested with Papaver dubium (Papaver rhoeas was the nearest relative), while Papaver gracile was the farthest and most distant taxon. Regarding poppy biennials and perennials of this second set, Papaver atlanticum was closer to Papaver caucasicum than to Papaver bracteatum. The MDS also revealed an unclarified taxonomic problem of the Papavereae, that of the infratribal links of Papaver alpinum (section Meconella). The dissimilarities of distant species, Papaver pavoninum and Papaver gracile, as opposed to opposite sets, suggested that Papaver alpinum could not be inserted in the set Roemeria-Argemonidium or in a hierarchy of all Papavereae taxa, but instead belonged, with 99.5 percent probability, to the set of Pseudopilosa, Meconidium, Macrantha, Rhoeadium and Papaver sections. Application of MDS at different systematical levels (tribe, set, or species) matched dissimilarities of taxa and the links within the taxa, ensuring true projections according to real views of Papavereae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The multidimensional scaling configuration separated Roemeria and Papaver section Argemonidium into distinct groups.

Taxon
Papavereaet0
Outcome
formed two distinct groupse0

Verbatim

e0

“taxa of Roemeria and the Papaver section Argemonidium, were not mixed, but formed two distinct groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Papavereae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver hybridum was closest to Roemeria.

Taxon
Papaver hybridumPapaver hybridume0
Outcome
closest species to Roemeriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver hybridum
Papaver hybridum · Taxon( Hans Hillewaert ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver hybridum was the closest species to Roemeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–849 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver pavoninum was the farthest taxon from Roemeria.

Taxon
Papaver pavoninumRoemeria pavoninae0
Outcome
farthest and most distant taxone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roemeria pavonina
Roemeria pavonina · TaxonNasser Halaweh · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver pavoninum was the farthest and most distant taxon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Papavereae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver somniferum and Papaver macrostomum did not cluster with Papaver dubium.

Taxon
Papaver somniferum and Papaver macrostomumPapaver somniferumPapaver macrostomume0
Outcome
not nested with Papaver dubiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver somniferum
Papaver somniferum · Taxontanja niggendijker from apeldoorn, the netherlands · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Papaver macrostomum
Papaver macrostomum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver somniferum and Papaver macrostomum were not nested with Papaver dubium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver rhoeas was the nearest relative of Papaver dubium.

Taxon
Papaver rhoeasPapaver rhoease0
Outcome
nearest relativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver rhoeas
Papaver rhoeas · TaxonJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver dubium (Papaver rhoeas was the nearest relative)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver gracile was the farthest taxon in the annual poppy set.

Taxon
Papaver gracilePapaver gracilee0
Outcome
farthest and most distant taxone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver gracile
Papaver gracile · TaxonEdmundas Greimas · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver gracile was the farthest and most distant taxon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver atlanticum was closer to Papaver caucasicum than to Papaver bracteatum.

Taxon
Papaver atlanticumPapaver atlanticume0
Outcome
closer to Papaver caucasicum than to Papaver bracteatume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver atlanticum
Papaver atlanticum · TaxonUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver atlanticum was closer to Papaver caucasicum than to Papaver bracteatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The analysis left the infratribal placement of Papaver alpinum unresolved.

Taxon
Papaver alpinumOreomecon alpinae0
Outcome
unclarified taxonomic probleme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oreomecon alpina
Oreomecon alpina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRossenGo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MDS also revealed an unclarified taxonomic problem of the Papavereae, that of the infratribal links of Papaver alpinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1416 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaver alpinum was assigned with 99.5 percent probability to the set containing Pseudopilosa, Meconidium, Macrantha, Rhoeadium and Papaver sections.

Taxon
Papaver alpinumOreomecon alpinae0
Outcome
belonged, with 99.5 percent probability, to the set of Pseudopilosa, Meconidium, Macrantha, Rhoeadium and Papaver sectionse0
Value
99.5 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oreomecon alpina
Oreomecon alpina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRossenGo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaver alpinum could not be inserted in the set Roemeria-Argemonidium or in a hierarchy of all Papavereae taxa, but instead belonged, with 99.5 percent probability, to the set of Pseudopilosa, Meconidium, Macrantha, Rhoeadium and Papaver sections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1808 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDS projections at tribe, set and species levels matched taxon dissimilarities and links.

Taxon
Papavereaet0
Outcome
matched dissimilarities of taxa and the links within the taxae0
Comparator
dissimilarities of taxae0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of MDS at different systematical levels (tribe, set, or species) matched dissimilarities of taxa and the links within the taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Papavereae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑