Paper · 2007 · Plant Disease

In-Furrow Applications of Metalaxyl and Phosphite for Control of Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato in New Brunswick, Canada

Khalil I. Al-Mughrabi; Rick D. Peters; H. W. (Bud) Platt; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of metalaxyl-m (Ridomil Gold 480EC) and phosphite (Phostrol) applied at planting in-furrow against pink rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of potato (Solanum tuberosum) 'Shepody' and 'Russet Burbank' was evaluated in field trials conducted in 2005 and 2006 in Florenceville, New Brunswick, Canada. Inoculum made from a metalaxyl-m-sensitive isolate of P. erythroseptica from New Brunswick was applied either in-furrow as a vermiculite slurry at planting or as a zoospore drench in soils adjacent to potato plants in late August. After harvest, the number and weight of tubers showing pink rot symptoms were assessed and expressed as percentages of the total tuber number and total weight of tubers. Metalaxyl-m applied in-furrow was significantly more effective against pink rot than phosphite. The mean percentage of diseased tubers as a percentage of total tuber weight was 1.5% (2005) and 1.2% (2006) for metalaxyl-m-treated plots and 9.6% (2005) and 2.8% (2006) for phosphite-treated plots, a percentage similar to that obtained in inoculated control plots with no fungicide treatment. The mean percentage of diseased tubers expressed as a percentage of the total number of tubers was 1.7% (2005) and 1.3% (2006) for metalaxyl-m-treated plots and 10.1% (2005) and 3.1% (2006) for phosphite-treated plots. Disease incidence was significantly higher using the late-season inoculation technique (respective means in 2005 and 2006 were 9.9 and 3.8% diseased tubers, by weight, and 10.6 and 3.9%, by number) than with the in-furrow inoculation method (respective means in 2005 and 2006 were 3.3 and 0.7% by weight, and 3.7 and 1.3%, by number). The potato cv. Shepody was significantly more susceptible to pink rot (9.9 and 3.3% diseased tubers, by weight, in 2005 and 2006, respectively, and 10.6 and 3.9%, by number) than Russet Burbank (respective means in 2005 and 2006 were 3.4,% and 1.2%, by weight, and 3.7,% and 1.2%, by number). Our findings indicate that metalaxyl applied in-furrow at planting is a viable option for control of pink rot caused by metalaxyl-sensitive strains of P. erythroseptica, whereas phosphite was ineffective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow metalaxyl-m controlled pink rot more effectively than phosphite.

Treatment
Metalaxyl-m applied in-furrowe0
Interactor
Phytophthora erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticat0pathogen
Outcome
pink rote0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
phosphitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metalaxyl-m applied in-furrow was significantly more effective against pink rot than phosphite.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl-m plots had 1.5% and 1.2% diseased tuber weight in 2005 and 2006, versus 9.6% and 2.8% for phosphite.

Treatment
metalaxyl-m-treated plotse0
Interactor
Phytophthora erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticat0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of diseased tubers as a percentage of total tuber weighte0
Value
1.5% (2005) and 1.2% (2006)e0
Qualifier
9.6% (2005) and 2.8% (2006)e0
Comparator
phosphite-treated plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean percentage of diseased tubers as a percentage of total tuber weight was 1.5% (2005) and 1.2% (2006) for metalaxyl-m-treated plots and 9.6% (2005) and 2.8% (2006) for phosphite-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl-m plots had 1.7% and 1.3% diseased tubers by number, versus 10.1% and 3.1% for phosphite.

Treatment
metalaxyl-m-treated plotse0
Interactor
Phytophthora erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticat0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of diseased tubers expressed as a percentage of the total number of tuberse0
Value
1.7% (2005) and 1.3% (2006)e0
Qualifier
10.1% (2005) and 3.1% (2006)e0
Comparator
phosphite-treated plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean percentage of diseased tubers expressed as a percentage of the total number of tubers was 1.7% (2005) and 1.3% (2006) for metalaxyl-m-treated plots and 10.1% (2005) and 3.1% (2006) for phosphite-treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season inoculation gave higher pink rot incidence by tuber weight than in-furrow inoculation.

Treatment
late-season inoculation techniquee0
Interactor
Phytophthora erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticat0pathogen
Outcome
diseased tubers, by weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.9 and 3.8%e0
Qualifier
3.3 and 0.7%e0
Comparator
in-furrow inoculation methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence was significantly higher using the late-season inoculation technique (respective means in 2005 and 2006 were 9.9 and 3.8% diseased tubers, by weight, and 10.6 and 3.9%, by number) than with the in-furrow inoculation method (respective means in 2005 and 2006 were 3.3 and 0.7% by weight, and 3.7 and 1.3%, by number).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season inoculation gave higher pink rot incidence by tuber number than in-furrow inoculation.

Treatment
late-season inoculation techniquee0
Interactor
Phytophthora erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticat0pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.6 and 3.9%e0
Qualifier
3.7 and 1.3%e0
Comparator
in-furrow inoculation methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease incidence was significantly higher using the late-season inoculation technique (respective means in 2005 and 2006 were 9.9 and 3.8% diseased tubers, by weight, and 10.6 and 3.9%, by number) than with the in-furrow inoculation method (respective means in 2005 and 2006 were 3.3 and 0.7% by weight, and 3.7 and 1.3%, by number).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shepody was more susceptible to pink rot than Russet Burbank.

Material
Shepodye0
Interactor
Phytophthora erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticat0pathogen
Outcome
susceptible to pink rote0
Direction
more susceptiblee0
Comparator
Russet Burbanke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The potato cv. Shepody was significantly more susceptible to pink rot (9.9 and 3.3% diseased tubers, by weight, in 2005 and 2006, respectively, and 10.6 and 3.9%, by number) than Russet Burbank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider in-furrow metalaxyl viable for pink rot caused by sensitive strains.

Treatment
metalaxyl applied in-furrow at plantinge0
Interactor
P. erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticae0pathogen
Outcome
viable option for control of pink rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metalaxyl applied in-furrow at planting is a viable option for control of pink rot caused by metalaxyl-sensitive strains of P. erythroseptica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2117 · show in text ↑
t0

“of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged phosphite ineffective against pink rot.

Interactor
Phytophthora erythrosepticaPhytophthora erythrosepticat0pathogen
Outcome
phosphite was ineffectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora erythroseptica
Phytophthora erythroseptica · InteractorHe Jiang, Hye Weon Hwang, Tongling Ge, Barbara Cole, Brian Perkins, Jianjun Hao · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas phosphite was ineffective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pink Rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) of Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–113 · show in text ↑

metalaxyl-M · Phytophthora erythroseptica · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · Phytophthora erythroseptica · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.