Paper · 1990 · Agronomy Journal

Yield Dynamics of Canopy Components in Alfalfa‐Grass Mixtures

G. D. Mooso; W. F. Wedin

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Relationships between alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) and associated grasses in a plant community are complex. A concern has developed whether alfalfa was, in fact, benefiting from grass association. A field study was conducted to describe the changes in canopy components of alfalfa‐reed canarygrass ( Phalaris arundinacea L.) and alfalfa‐orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.) mixtures. Alfalfa‐grass mixtures of one row of grass between two rows of alfalfa and one row of alfalfa between two rows of grass were planted in a repeating pattern. Monocultures of each species and four binary mixtures were sampled for total, alfalfa and grass component, and stratified alfalfa yields were measured at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 d of spring and summer regrowth for 2 yr. Planting pattern, grass species and season of growth affected botanical composition and yield of alfalfa‐grass mixtures. Alfalfa‐grass mixtures yielded more than alfalfa monocultures during only one spring growth cycle. During summer regrowth, alfalfa‐grass mixtures were less productive than alfalfa monocultures. In spring, reed canarygrass accounted for a greater proportion of the total yield than orchardgrass, whereas the two grasses were similar during summer. Grass yields of mixtures were not affected by alfalfa association. The results of this study suggest that alfalfa‐grass mixtures offer little yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures when harvested as hay.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern, grass species and season affected mixture botanical composition.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Planting patterne0
Interactor
grasse0other
Outcome
botanical compositione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting pattern, grass species and season of growth affected botanical composition and yield of alfalfa‐grass mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–890 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting pattern, grass species and season affected mixture yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Planting patterne0
Interactor
grasse0other
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting pattern, grass species and season of growth affected botanical composition and yield of alfalfa‐grass mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa-grass mixtures exceeded alfalfa monoculture yield in only one spring cycle.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Alfalfa‐grass mixturese0
Interactor
grasse0other
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
only one spring growth cyclee0
Comparator
alfalfa monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa‐grass mixtures yielded more than alfalfa monocultures during only one spring growth cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa-grass mixtures were less productive than alfalfa monocultures in summer regrowth.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
alfalfa‐grass mixturese0
Interactor
grasse0other
Outcome
productivee0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
summer regrowthe0
Comparator
alfalfa monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During summer regrowth, alfalfa‐grass mixtures were less productive than alfalfa monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1084 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reed canarygrass contributed more to spring total yield than orchardgrass.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Interactor
reed canarygrasse0other
Second interactor
orchardgrassDactylis glomeratae0other
Outcome
proportion of the total yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · Second interactorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spring, reed canarygrass accounted for a greater proportion of the total yield than orchardgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two grasses had similar summer yield proportions.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Interactor
reed canarygrasse0other
Second interactor
orchardgrassDactylis glomeratae0other
Outcome
proportion of the total yielde0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
summere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · Second interactorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reed canarygrass accounted for a greater proportion of the total yield than orchardgrass, whereas the two grasses were similar during summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass yield in mixtures was unaffected by alfalfa association.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
Grasse0other
Outcome
Grass yieldse0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grass yields of mixtures were not affected by alfalfa association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1304 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude mixtures offer little hay yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
grasse0other
Outcome
little yield advantagee0
Qualifier
when harvested as haye0
Comparator
alfalfa monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa‐grass mixtures offer little yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures when harvested as hay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1444 · show in text ↑