Paper · 1992 · Applied Engineering in Agriculture

Economics of Direct Seeding Cabbage to a Stand Using Precision Cultural Systems

P. E. Bergeron; R. L. Parish; R. P. Bracy; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Many cabbage growers who direct-seed cabbage follow the common practice of planting a seed every 76-102 mm (3-4 in.) and later thin the stand to an approximate 305 mm (12 in.) spacing. This procedure generally results in a good uniform stand, but seed and labor costs are high and thinning labor is sometimes difficult to obtain. Experiments at the Hammond Research Station have shown that precision seeding directly to a 305 mm (12 in.) seed spacing gives equivalent yields and head size. Two basic savings resulting from precision seeding to a stand are seed cost and thinning labor cost. An economic analysis using the Mississippi State Budget Generator (Spurlock et al. 1985) with Louisiana data indicated that adoption of the seed-to-stand practice on 1.02 m (40 in.) twin drill rows can save a grower about $150/ha ($60/acre) with no loss in yield or quality, thus giving a net increase in profits of $150/ha ($60/acre).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precision seeding to 305 mm spacing produced equivalent cabbage yields.

Treatment
precision seeding directly to a 305 mm (12 in.) seed spacinge0
Outcome
yields and head sizee0
Direction
equivalente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“precision seeding directly to a 305 mm (12 in.) seed spacing gives equivalent yields and head size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Seed to stand practice can save about $150/ha without yield or quality loss.

Treatment
seed-to-stand practicee0
Outcome
save a growere0
Value
$150/ha ($60/acre)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adoption of the seed-to-stand practice on 1.02 m (40 in.) twin drill rows can save a grower about $150/ha ($60/acre) with no loss in yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The practice gives a net profit increase of $150/ha.

Outcome
profitse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
$150/ha ($60/acre)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thus giving a net increase in profits of $150/ha ($60/acre)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–35 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 50 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.