Paper · 1980 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Effect of wheat seeding rate on wild oat competition

BJ Radford; BJ Wilson; O Cartledge; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A series of field trials was sown on black earth soils on the Darling Downs, Queensland, with five wheat seeding rates x five levels of wild oat infestation. The lowest seeding rate required to produce optimum grain yield at a site was higher in wild oat infested plots than in weed-free plots. Increase in seeding rate reduced the dry weight of wild oats at maturity and increased the dry weight of wheat at maturity until wheat population density exceeded 150 plants m-2. Increase in seeding rate also reduced wild oat seed production, especially at low wild oat population densities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest seeding rate for optimum wheat yield was higher in wild oat infested than weed free plots.

Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
lowest seeding rate required to produce optimum grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weed-free plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest seeding rate required to produce optimum grain yield at a site was higher in wild oat infested plots than in weed-free plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher wheat seeding rate reduced wild oat dry weight at maturity.

Treatment
Increase in seeding ratee0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
dry weight of wild oats at maturitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in seeding rate reduced the dry weight of wild oats at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–367 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher wheat seeding rate reduced wild oat seed production, especially at low weed density.

Treatment
Increase in seeding ratee0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
wild oat seed productione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
especially at low wild oat population densitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in seeding rate also reduced wild oat seed production, especially at low wild oat population densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑

density · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.