Paper · 2003 · Pest Management Science

Investigation of alternatives to methyl bromide for management of Meloidogyne javanica on greenhouse grown tomato

Emmanuel A Tzortzakakis; Serafim E Petsas

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The root galling index and the densities of eggs in roots and juveniles in soil of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitwood on tomato, and the effect of these on crop yield were assessed in greenhouse experiments applying various treatments at two different sites in Crete, Greece. Tomato crops were grown for four cycles by rotating nematode-resistant (first and third spring crops) with susceptible (second and fourth autumn crops) cultivars and receiving the following treatments: (a) untreated control; (b) methyl bromide application before the first and third crops; (c) application of the fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia (Goddard) Zare, Gams & Evans before planting the first, third and fourth crops with a supplementary application three weeks after the beginning of the fourth crop; (d) application of oxamyl in both sites and fenamiphos in site 1 only at the second and fourth crops; (e) combination of treatments (c) and (d). The fungus density in soil was monitored three weeks after application and at the end of each crop, when roots were lifted. Pochonia chlamydosporia had a variable establishment and did not control the nematode. Its pathogenicity on eggs was not demonstrated, as in all cases galls were big, with all egg masses inside and protected from infection. The methyl bromide treatment significantly reduced root galling and egg production compared to other treatments in all crop cycles and the yield of the fourth crop was significantly greater. Nematicides reduced nematode densities compared with untreated controls and the fungus treatment, but they were less effective than methyl bromide and resulted in increased yield in one site only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia chlamydosporia had a variable establishment in the soil.

Interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
variable establishmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pochonia chlamydosporia had a variable establishment and did not control the nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1164 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia chlamydosporia did not control the root-knot nematode.

Treatment
Pochonia chlamydosporiae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pest
Second interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control the nematodee1
Direction
did not controle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pochonia chlamydosporia had a variable establishment and did not control the nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogenicity of Pochonia chlamydosporia on nematode eggs was not demonstrated, as galls were big with all egg masses inside and protected from infection.

Interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pathogenicity on eggse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pochonia chlamydosporia had a variable establishment and did not control the nematode. Its pathogenicity on eggs was not demonstrated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1212 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide significantly reduced root galling and egg production compared to the other treatments in all crop cycles.

Treatment
methyl bromide treatmente1
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pest
Outcome
root galling and egg productione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The methyl bromide treatment significantly reduced root galling and egg production compared to other treatments in all crop cycles and the yield of the fourth crop was significantly greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield of the fourth tomato crop was significantly greater with methyl bromide.

Treatment
methyl bromide treatmente1
Outcome
the yield of the fourth crope1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The methyl bromide treatment significantly reduced root galling and egg production compared to other treatments in all crop cycles and the yield of the fourth crop was significantly greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1492 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicides reduced nematode densities compared with untreated controls and the fungus treatment.

Treatment
Nematicidese1
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat0pest
Outcome
nematode densitiese1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
untreated controls and the fungus treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nematicides reduced nematode densities compared with untreated controls and the fungus treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicides were less effective than methyl bromide.

Treatment
Nematicidese1
Outcome
less effectivee1
Direction
less effectivee1
Comparator
methyl bromidee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nematicides reduced nematode densities compared with untreated controls and the fungus treatment, but they were less effective than methyl bromide and resulted in increased yield in one site only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1689 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicides resulted in increased tomato yield in one site only.

Treatment
Nematicidese1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in one site onlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Nematicides reduced nematode densities compared with untreated controls and the fungus treatment, but they were less effective than methyl bromide and resulted in increased yield in one site only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1689 · show in text ↑
t1

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 · show in text ↑

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

bromomethane · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

bromomethane · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.