Paper · 1998 · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Bark lesions on beech (Fagus sylvatica) and their relation to epiphytes and site variables in scania, South Sweden

Anna Maria Jönsson

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Beech bark lesions, (Cryptococcus fagisuga), the most common lichen and fungi epiphytes on beech (Fagus sylvatica) stems were studied at 48 sites in Scania, south Sweden. Different site variables and the influence of nitrogen deposition were investigated. The field vegetation and lichens were used as biological indicators by calculating indices for nutrition status, toxicity, pH, light and moisture. Two sets of lichen indices, from Hultengren and Ellenberg, respectively, were calculated. Beech bark lesions were found at 25 sites and were more frequent at more polluted sites with much C. fagisuga and Lecanora conizaeoides, and on largish trees. Algae cover and C. fagisuga were positively correlated. Both preferred sites with no direct light exposure, high nitrogen deposition and low pH. The two sets of lichen indices were fairly comparable for toxitolerance, light and pH. In this investigation, Lepraria incana was the most frequent of all epiphytes, often determining the value of the lichen indices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beech bark lesions were more frequent at polluted sites with much C. fagisuga and Lecanora conizaeoides and on largish trees.

Taxon
Beeche0
Interactor
C. fagisugaCryptococcus fagisugae0pest
Second interactor
Lecanora conizaeoidesStraminella conizaeoidese0other
Outcome
bark lesionse0
Direction
more frequente0
Qualifier
on largish treese0
Setting
more polluted sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryptococcus fagisuga
Cryptococcus fagisuga · InteractorJoseph O'Brien, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Straminella conizaeoides
Straminella conizaeoides · Second interactorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beech bark lesions were found at 25 sites and were more frequent at more polluted sites with much C. fagisuga and Lecanora conizaeoides, and on largish trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–651 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Algae cover and C. fagisuga were positively correlated.

Taxon
Algaee0
Interactor
C. fagisugaCryptococcus fagisugae0other
Outcome
Algae covere0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryptococcus fagisuga
Cryptococcus fagisuga · InteractorJoseph O'Brien, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Algae cover and C. fagisuga were positively correlated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–707 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Algae preferred sites without direct light exposure, with high nitrogen deposition and low pH.

Taxon
Algaee0
Outcome
preferred sitese0
Setting
sites with no direct light exposure, high nitrogen deposition and low pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Algae cover and C. fagisuga were positively correlated. Both preferred sites with no direct light exposure, high nitrogen deposition and low pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–796 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. fagisuga preferred sites without direct light exposure, with high nitrogen deposition and low pH.

Taxon
C. fagisugaCryptococcus fagisugae0
Outcome
preferred sitese0
Setting
sites with no direct light exposure, high nitrogen deposition and low pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryptococcus fagisuga
Cryptococcus fagisuga · TaxonJoseph O'Brien, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Algae cover and C. fagisuga were positively correlated. Both preferred sites with no direct light exposure, high nitrogen deposition and low pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–796 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two sets of lichen indices were fairly comparable for toxitolerance, light and pH.

Taxon
lichene0
Outcome
toxitolerance, light and pHe0
Qualifier
fairly comparablee0
Comparator
two sets of lichen indicese0

Verbatim

e0

“The two sets of lichen indices were fairly comparable for toxitolerance, light and pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–883 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lepraria incana was the most frequent epiphyte and often determined lichen index values.

Taxon
Lepraria incanaLepraria incanae0
Outcome
most frequent of all epiphytese0
Direction
most frequente0
Qualifier
often determining the value of the lichen indicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepraria incana
Lepraria incana · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this investigation, Lepraria incana was the most frequent of all epiphytes, often determining the value of the lichen indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1013 · show in text ↑