Paper · 2000 · Journal of Vegetable Crop Production

Broadcast vs. Band Fertilizer Applications on Summer Squash

Richard L. Parish; Regina P. Bracy; Joe E. McCoy

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three methods of preplant fertilizer application (broad-cast-and-bed, bed-and-broadcast, and bed-and-band) and two methods of sidedress fertilizer application (broadcast and band) on zucchini and yellow straightneck summer squash (Cucurbita pepo var. melopepo [L.] Alef.) were compared. With crops planted in late spring and early summer, no differences in yield due to sidedress method and few differences due to preplant application method were found. A trend toward lower yields with the bed-and-broadcast method was noted. No yield loss resulted when the more cost-effective broadcast method was used for preplant or sidedress fertilizer application to summer squash if the preplant broadcast application was made prior to the bedding operation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sidedress fertilizer application method did not differ in yield.

Taxon
Summer Squasht0
Treatment
sidedress methode0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in yield due to sidedress method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant application methods produced few yield differences.

Taxon
Summer Squasht0
Treatment
preplant application methode0
Outcome
differencese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“few differences due to preplant application method were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed-and-broadcast preplant application tended toward lower yields.

Taxon
Summer Squasht0
Treatment
bed-and-broadcast methode0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A trend toward lower yields with the bed-and-broadcast method was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast preplant or sidedress application did not reduce squash yield when preplant broadcast preceded bedding.

Taxon
summer squashe0
Treatment
broadcast methode0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
No yield losse0
Qualifier
if the preplant broadcast application was made prior to the bedding operatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No yield loss resulted when the more cost-effective broadcast method was used for preplant or sidedress fertilizer application to summer squash if the preplant broadcast application was made prior to the bedding operation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–757 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.