Paper · 2006 · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Nondestructive measurement of reducing sugar of apples using Vis/NIR spectroscopy techniques

Yihong Jiang; Xiaoli Li; Xiujun Bai; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this research, the potential ofusing the Visible/Near Infrared Spectroscopy (VisINIRS) was investigated for measuring the reducing sugar of Fuji apple (from Shanxi of China), and the relationship was established between nondestructive Vis/NIR spectral measurement and the reducing sugar of apple. Intact apple fruit were measured by reflectance Vis/NIR in 325-1075 nm range. The data set as the logarithms of the reflectance reciprocal (absorbance (logl/R)) was analyzed in order to build the best calibration model for this characteristic, using some spectral pretreatments and multivariate calibration techniques such as partial least square regression (PLS). The models for the reducing sugar (r=0.915), standard error of prediction (SEP) 0.562 with a bias of 0.054; shown the excellent prediction performance. The Vis/NIR spectroscopy technique had significantly greater accuracy for determining the reducing sugar. It was concluded that by using the Vis/NIRS measurement technique, in the spectral range (325-1075 nm), it is possible to assess the reducing sugar content of apple.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction of reducing sugar had r=0.915.

Taxon
Fuji applee0
Outcome
reducing sugare1
Value
r=0.915e1

Verbatim

e0

“reducing sugar of Fuji apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“reducing sugar (r=0.915)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–708 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard error of prediction was 0.562.

Taxon
Fuji applee0
Outcome
standard error of predictione1
Value
0.562e1

Verbatim

e0

“Fuji apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“standard error of prediction (SEP) 0.562”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–750 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction bias was 0.054.

Taxon
Fuji applee0
Outcome
biase1
Value
0.054e1

Verbatim

e0

“Fuji apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“bias of 0.054”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–771 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vis/NIR had significantly greater accuracy for reducing sugar.

Taxon
Fuji applee0
Outcome
accuracye1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
greatere1

Verbatim

e0

“Fuji apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vis/NIR spectroscopy technique had significantly greater accuracy for determining the reducing sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–921 · show in text ↑