Paper · 2007 · Austral Ecology

Mistletoe fruit‐colour polymorphism and differential success in a habitat mosaic

CATHERINE E. BACH; DAVE KELLY

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Polymorphisms in fruit colour are common in nature, but mechanistic explanations for the factor(s) responsible for their maintenance are for the most part lacking. Past studies have focused on frugivore colour preferences and fruit removal rates, but until recently there has been no evidence that these factors are responsible for the maintenance of the polymorphisms. For other types of genetic polymorphisms, habitat heterogeneity has been shown to play a role in their maintenance. Here we test the habitat heterogeneity hypothesis for a polymorphic New Zealand mistletoe. We show that red‐fruited and orange‐fruited morphs of the mistletoe Alepis flavida (Hook. F) Tiegh. (Loranthaceae) differ in their growth, mortality and flowering on forest edges and in forest interior. Red‐fruited morphs, which are preferred by dispersers, grew, survived and flowered as well as orange‐fruited morphs on edges, whereas orange‐fruited morphs had much greater growth, survival, and flowering than red‐fruited morphs in the forest interior. This is the first evidence that habitat‐specific differences in growth and survival may contribute to maintaining fruit‐colour polymorphisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In forest interior, orange-fruited mistletoe morphs had much greater growth, survival and flowering than red-fruited morphs.

Taxon
Alepis flavidaAlepis flavidae1
Material
orangee2
Outcome
growth, survival, and floweringe2
Direction
much greatere2
Comparator
rede2
Setting
forest interiore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alepis flavida
Alepis flavida · TaxonJohn Barkla · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the mistletoe Alepis flavida (Hook. F) Tiegh. (Loranthaceae) differ in their growth, mortality and flowering on forest edges and in forest interior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–787 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas orange‐fruited morphs had much greater growth, survival, and flowering than red‐fruited morphs in the forest interior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1040 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On forest edges, red-fruited mistletoe morphs grew, survived and flowered as well as orange-fruited morphs.

Taxon
Alepis flavidaAlepis flavidae1
Material
Rede3
Outcome
grew, survived and flowerede3
Direction
as well ase3
Comparator
orangee3
Setting
on edgese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alepis flavida
Alepis flavida · TaxonJohn Barkla · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the mistletoe Alepis flavida (Hook. F) Tiegh. (Loranthaceae) differ in their growth, mortality and flowering on forest edges and in forest interior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–787 · show in text ↑
e3

“Red‐fruited morphs, which are preferred by dispersers, grew, survived and flowered as well as orange‐fruited morphs on edges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–913 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Habitat-specific differences in growth and survival may contribute to maintaining fruit colour polymorphism in mistletoe.

Taxon
mistletoee1
Outcome
maintaining fruite4
Qualifier
growth and survivale4

Verbatim

e1

“the mistletoe Alepis flavida (Hook. F) Tiegh. (Loranthaceae) differ in their growth, mortality and flowering on forest edges and in forest interior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–787 · show in text ↑
e4

“This is the first evidence that habitat‐specific differences in growth and survival may contribute to maintaining fruit‐colour polymorphisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1182 · show in text ↑