Paper · 1997 · Compost Science & Utilization

Agricultural and Municipal Compost Residues for Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper

Joan Marull; Jorge Pinochet; Rodrigo Rodríguez-Kábana

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of olive (Olea europea) pomace (OP), chicken litter (CL), and municipal compost residues (MCR) as soil amendments for control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) was studied in shadehouse and field microplot experiments. Results from a shadehouse experiment with green pepper (Capsicum annum) demonstrated that plants in soil amended with MCR, OP, and MCR+OP had lower numbers of M. javanica in the roots than those grown in unamended control soil. Ammonia ted OP (treated with NH3) was not as effective as the other amendments for nematode control. Amended soils exhibited higher esterase activity than control soil and numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity. In a field microplot experiment with tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) highest yields in soil fumigated with methyl bromide and infested with the nematode after fumigation were obtained with CL+OP amendments; highest yields in nonfumigated soil also infested with the nematode corresponded to treatments with MCR+OP, CL+OP, and CL. Most amendments in the microplot experiment were suppressive of M. javanica. Numbers of M. javanica juveniles in unamended, methyl bromide-treated soil were higher than in unamended unfumigated soil at harvest. Esterase activity was higher in amended soils than those without amendments irrespective of whether the soils had been treated with methyl bromide or not. Numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity in unfumigated soil but not in soil treated with methyl bromide. Juvenile population densities in soil were inversely related to esterase activity in both fumigated and unfumigated soil. However, the model describing the relationship between the two variables indicated a more rapid decline in nematode numbers with increasing enzymatic activity for unfumigated soil than in methyl bromide-treated soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCR, OP and MCR+OP amended soils had fewer M. javanica in pepper roots than unamended soil in a shadehouse experiment

Taxon
green peppere2
Treatment
soil amended with MCR, OP, and MCR+OPe1
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pest
Outcome
numbers of M. javanica in the rootse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
unamended control soile1
Setting
shadehousee2

Verbatim

e1

“plants in soil amended with MCR, OP, and MCR+OP had lower numbers of M. javanica in the roots than those grown in unamended control soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results from a shadehouse experiment with green pepper (Capsicum annum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia-treated olive pomace was less effective than the other amendments for nematode control

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Treatment
Ammonia ted OP (treated with NH3)e3
Outcome
nematode controle3
Direction
not as effectivee3
Comparator
the other amendmentse3

Verbatim

e3

“Ammonia ted OP (treated with NH3) was not as effective as the other amendments for nematode control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amended soils had higher esterase activity than control soil

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Treatment
Amended soilse4
Outcome
esterase activitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
control soile4

Verbatim

e4

“Amended soils exhibited higher esterase activity than control soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Gene
soil esterase activitye5
Outcome
numbers of nematodes per gram of roote5
Direction
inversely relatede5

Verbatim

e5

“and numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unfumigated soil, nematode numbers per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Gene
soil esterase activitye6
Outcome
Numbers of nematodes per gram of roote6
Direction
inversely relatede6
Setting
unfumigated soile6

Verbatim

e6

“Numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity in unfumigated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In methyl bromide-treated soil, nematode numbers per gram of root were not related to soil esterase activity

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Gene
soil esterase activitye7
Outcome
Numbers of nematodes per gram of roote7
Direction
but note7
Setting
soil treated with methyl bromidee7

Verbatim

e7

“Numbers of nematodes per gram of root were inversely related to soil esterase activity in unfumigated soil but not in soil treated with methyl bromide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Juvenile densities in soil were inversely related to esterase activity in both fumigated and unfumigated soil

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Gene
esterase activitye0
Outcome
Juvenile population densities in soile0
Direction
inversely relatede0
Setting
fumigated and unfumigated soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Juvenile population densities in soil were inversely related to esterase activity in both fumigated and unfumigated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode numbers declined more rapidly with increasing enzymatic activity in unfumigated soil than in methyl bromide-treated soil

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Gene
enzymatic activitye0
Outcome
nematode numberse0
Direction
more rapid declinee0
Comparator
methyl bromide-treated soile0
Setting
unfumigated soile0

Verbatim

e0

“the model describing the relationship between the two variables indicated a more rapid decline in nematode numbers with increasing enzymatic activity for unfumigated soil than in methyl bromide-treated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CL+OP amendments gave the highest tomato yields in methyl bromide-fumigated soil infested with the nematode

Treatment
CL+OP amendmentse1
Interactor
nematodeNematodae1pest
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
field microplot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a field microplot experiment with tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest yields in soil fumigated with methyl bromide and infested with the nematode after fumigation were obtained with CL+OP amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCR+OP, CL+OP and CL gave the highest tomato yields in nonfumigated soil infested with the nematode

Treatment
MCR+OP, CL+OP, and CLe1
Interactor
nematodeNematodae1pest
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
nonfumigated soile1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a field microplot experiment with tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest yields in nonfumigated soil also infested with the nematode corresponded to treatments with MCR+OP, CL+OP, and CL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most amendments were suppressive of M. javanica in the microplot experiment

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Treatment
amendmentse0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
suppressive of M. javanicae0
Direction
suppressivee0
Setting
microplot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Most amendments in the microplot experiment were suppressive of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide treatment increased M. javanica juveniles compared with unfumigated soil at harvest

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Treatment
methyl bromide-treated soile0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Outcome
Numbers of M. javanica juvenilese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unamended unfumigated soile0
Setting
at harveste0

Verbatim

e0

“Numbers of M. javanica juveniles in unamended, methyl bromide-treated soil were higher than in unamended unfumigated soil at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Esterase activity was higher in amended soils than in unamended soils whether or not methyl bromide was applied

Taxon
Tomato and Peppert0
Treatment
amended soilse0
Outcome
Esterase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
those without amendmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Esterase activity was higher in amended soils than those without amendments irrespective of whether the soils had been treated with methyl bromide or not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Control of Root-Knot Nematodes in Tomato and Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–99 · show in text ↑

other · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.