Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in 1989 and 1990 to study the effects of chlorothalonil, flutolanil, and aldicarb, singularly and in combination, on late leaf spot, caused by Cercosporidium personatum, southern stem rot, caused by Sclerotium rolfsii, and root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne arenaria, on Florunner and Southern Runner peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. In a split-plot experiment, Florunner and Southern Runner were treated with chlorothalonil at 0, 0.6, or 1.2 kg a.i./ha; flutolanil at 0 or 2.2 kg a.i./ha; and aldicarb at 0 or 3.4 kg a.i./ha. Southern stem rot and nematode pressure were severe in both years, and late leaf spot was severe in 1989. Leaf spot was more severe in Florunner than in Southern Runner in control plots both years and in plots receiving the low rate of chlorothalonil in 1990. In both years, the high rate of chlorothalonil reduced late leaf spot severity more than the low rate. Aldicarb and flutolanil did not affect late leaf spot severity. Flutolanil and aldicarb reduced the incidence of southern stem rot in both cultivars in both years, but flutolanil was more effective than aldicarb. Chlorothalonil had little or no effect on incidence of southern stem rot, and both cultivars were equally susceptible. Aldicarb reduced root-gall indices in both years, but no effects were attributable to cultivar or fungicide. Yields for the two cultivars were not different. In both cultivars, effects of chlorothalonil, flutolanil, and aldicarb were additive on yield increases for both years
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Late leaf spot was more severe in Florunner than Southern Runner in control plots and low chlorothalonil plots.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Material
- Florunnere0
- Outcome
- Leaf spote0
- Direction
- more severee0
- Qualifier
- control plots both years and in plots receiving the low rate of chlorothalonil in 1990e0
- Comparator
- Southern Runnere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Leaf spot was more severe in Florunner than in Southern Runner in control plots both years and in plots receiving the low rate of chlorothalonil in 1990.”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
High rate chlorothalonil reduced late leaf spot severity more than the low rate.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- high rate of chlorothalonile0
- Outcome
- late leaf spot severitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- low ratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In both years, the high rate of chlorothalonil reduced late leaf spot severity more than the low rate.”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb did not affect late leaf spot severity.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Aldicarbe0
- Outcome
- late leaf spot severitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Aldicarb and flutolanil did not affect late leaf spot severity.”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Flutolanil did not affect late leaf spot severity.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- flutolanile0
- Outcome
- late leaf spot severitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Aldicarb and flutolanil did not affect late leaf spot severity.”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Flutolanil reduced southern stem rot incidence in both cultivars in both years.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Flutolanile0
- Outcome
- incidence of southern stem rote0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Flutolanil and aldicarb reduced the incidence of southern stem rot in both cultivars in both years, but flutolanil was more effective than aldicarb.”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb reduced southern stem rot incidence in both cultivars in both years.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- aldicarbe0
- Outcome
- incidence of southern stem rote0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Flutolanil and aldicarb reduced the incidence of southern stem rot in both cultivars in both years, but flutolanil was more effective than aldicarb.”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Flutolanil was more effective against southern stem rot than aldicarb.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- flutolanile0
- Outcome
- more effectivee0
- Direction
- more effectivee0
- Comparator
- aldicarbe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“flutolanil was more effective than aldicarb”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorothalonil had little or no effect on southern stem rot incidence.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Chlorothalonile0
- Outcome
- incidence of southern stem rote0
- Direction
- little or no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Chlorothalonil had little or no effect on incidence of southern stem rot”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Both cultivars were equally susceptible to southern stem rot.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Outcome
- equally susceptiblee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“both cultivars were equally susceptible”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb reduced root gall indices in both years.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Aldicarbe0
- Outcome
- root-gall indicese0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Aldicarb reduced root-gall indices in both years”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar had no attributable effect on root gall indices.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Outcome
- no effects were attributable to cultivare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“no effects were attributable to cultivar or fungicide”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide had no attributable effect on root gall indices.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Outcome
- no effects were attributable to cultivar or fungicidee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“no effects were attributable to cultivar or fungicide”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield did not differ between the two cultivars.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Direction
- not differente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yields for the two cultivars were not different.”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
The three chemicals had additive yield increasing effects in both cultivars in both years.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Outcome
- yield increasese0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Qualifier
- additivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In both cultivars, effects of chlorothalonil, flutolanil, and aldicarb were additive on yield increases for both years”
t0“Peanut Cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
aldicarb · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →flutolanil · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →chlorothalonil · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.