Paper · 1968 · Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie

The Susceptibility of Certain Cotton Varieties to Empoasca spp. (Jassidae)‐Infestation Under Some Different Agricultural Practices in U.A.R.

M. M. Hosny; S. A. El.‐Dessouki

15
claims
37
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The different tests of the susceptibility in several cotton varieties to jassid‐infestation lead to the following conclusions: a. At Shoubra experimental area the means of jassid numbers on 4 varieties of Egyptian cotton were relatively low and insignificantly different from each others in the “unfertilized” treatment. The means increased gradually with the increase in the rate of fertilization (75, 150 and 225 kgms/feddan). The varieties in the latter cases showed varying susceptibilities and it could be arranged ascendingly according to the rates of infestation on them as follows: Bahteem 185 (least susceptible), Ashmouny, Giza 47 and finally Dandarah (most susceptible). b. When 12 varieties of cotton were tested, at the Bahteem experimental area, for their susceptibility to jassids irrespective of any special treatment, a new pubescent strain of G. barbadense proved to be most resistant to jassids. On the other hand the cotton variety Triespecies No. I (H. recurrent) was the most susceptible. The remaining 10 varieties showed varying degrees of susceptibility and resistance between the above two extremes (Table 6). c. Comparing the susceptibility in five Egyptian cotton varieties at Abouzabaal, with regard to 3 sowing dates, 3 sowing‐spaces and 3 rates of fertilization; the Giza 66 variety was found to be the most susceptible species among those tested throughout these treatments. The remaining four varieties hardly showed any difference within themselves in this respect. d. In the general test of the relation between jassid‐infestation and sowing‐dates of cotton, 3 dates were applied at Abouzabaal during 1964, viz. 10th March, 25th March and 8th April. The middle date, however, was repeated in the Shoubra experiment while a later fourth sowing date, 3rd May, was followed in the Bahteem area (in the same year). By comparing the jassid‐infestation averages in those dates irrespective of locality it could be concluded that the jassid infestation was markedly reduced on the second date of sowing, on 25th March (at both Abouzabaal and Shoubra). The mean number of jassids was relatively higher on the plants sown on either 10th March or 8th April and was considerably higher still on the plants sown later, on 3rd May (at Bahteem). e. In a brief test of the corelative dependence between the jassid‐infestation and both the length and density of the hairs on the cotton leaves, the following two remarks could be drawn: 1. There was a general tendency in the jassid infestation‐averages to decrease which the increase in hair‐density. 2. The hairiness could hardly be regarded as a primary to characteristic of resistance in the cotton leaves unless the dens hairs extend to the mid‐rib and other veins on the lower surfaces of the leaves. 3. The hair‐lengths within the ranges common on the tested varieties (514.3 μ‐690.1 μ) had apparently no significance in the mechanism of resistance to jassids. Zusammenfassung Verschiedene Versuche über die Anfälligkeit einiger Baumwollsorten gegenüber Jassiden zeigten folgende Ergebnisse: a. In Stickstoff‐Düngungsversuchen zeigten die geprüften Sorten in den ungedüngten Reihen keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Jassiden‐Befall. Mit steigender Düngergabe konnte jedoch eine unterschiedliche Anfälligkeit beobachtet werden, wobei die Sorte “Bahteem 185” die geringste und die Sorte “Dandarah” die höchste Anfälligkeit aufwiesen. b. Beim Test von 12 Baumwoll‐Sorten auf Jassiden‐Befall ohne unterschiedliche Behandlung erwies sich ein neuer Stamm von Gossypium barbadense als am meisten restistent gegenüber Jassiden, während ein anderer Stamm ( Triespecies No. I , High recurrent) sehr anfällig war. Die übrigen 10 Sorten zeigten einen unterschiedlichen Grad der Anfälligkeit bzw. Resistenz, die zwischen den beiden obengenannten Extremen lag (Tab. 6). c. In einem anderen Versuch mit 3 Aussaat‐Terminen, unterschiedlichen Reihenabständen und steigenden Düngergaben war die Sorte “Giza 66” zu allen 3 Varianten am anfälligsten. Die übrigen Sorten zeigten untereinander nur geringe Differenzen. d. Bei der Prüfung unterschiedlicher Aussaat‐Termine (10. März, 25. März, 8. April, 3. Mai) konnte bei Baumwolle, die zum zweiten Termin ausge sät wurde, der geringste Befall festgestellt werden. Am höchsten war der Befall bei den am 3. Mai ausgesäten Pflanzen. e. Ein Test über die Auswirkung von Behaarungsdichte und Haarlänge auf Jassiden‐Befall zeigte, daß mit zunehmender Haardichte der Befall zu rückgeht. Die Haarlänge der getesteten Sorten (514.3–690.1μ) hatte da gegen keinen gesicherten Einfluß auf die Resistenz gegen Jassiden.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized cotton varieties had low, insignificantly different jassid numbers.

Treatment
“unfertilized”e0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
means of jassid numberse0
Direction
relatively lowe0
Setting
Shoubra experimental areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Shoubra experimental area the means of jassid numbers on 4 varieties of Egyptian cotton were relatively low and insignificantly different from each others in the “unfertilized” treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jassid numbers increased with fertilization rate.

Treatment
rate of fertilization (75, 150 and 225 kgms/feddan)e0
Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
meanse0
Direction
increased graduallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The means increased gradually with the increase in the rate of fertilization (75, 150 and 225 kgms/feddan).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bahteem 185 was least susceptible among four varieties under fertilization.

Material
Bahteem 185e0
Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
least susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bahteem 185 (least susceptible), Ashmouny, Giza 47 and finally Dandarah (most susceptible).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dandarah was most susceptible among four varieties under fertilization.

Material
Dandarahe0
Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
most susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bahteem 185 (least susceptible), Ashmouny, Giza 47 and finally Dandarah (most susceptible).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A new pubescent G. barbadense strain was most resistant to jassids.

Material
a new pubescent strain of G. barbadensee0
Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
most resistant to jassidse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a new pubescent strain of G. barbadense proved to be most resistant to jassids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triespecies No. I was most susceptible to jassids.

Material
Triespecies No. Ie0
Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
most susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton variety Triespecies No. I (H. recurrent) was the most susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1018 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other ten varieties had intermediate susceptibility or resistance.

Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
varying degrees of susceptibility and resistancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The remaining 10 varieties showed varying degrees of susceptibility and resistance between the above two extremes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 66 was the most susceptible across sowing dates, spacing and fertilization.

Material
Giza 66e0
Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
most susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Giza 66 variety was found to be the most susceptible species among those tested throughout these treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other four varieties showed little difference in susceptibility.

Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
hardly showed any differencee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The remaining four varieties hardly showed any difference within themselves in this respect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 25th March reduced jassid infestation.

Treatment
25th Marche0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jassid infestatione0
Direction
markedly reducede0
Setting
Abouzabaal and Shoubrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“jassid infestation was markedly reduced on the second date of sowing, on 25th March (at both Abouzabaal and Shoubra).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jassid counts were higher for 10th March and 8th April sowing.

Treatment
10th March or 8th Aprile0
Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
mean number of jassidse0
Direction
relatively highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean number of jassids was relatively higher on the plants sown on either 10th March or 8th April”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2088–2189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jassid counts were still higher for 3rd May sowing.

Treatment
3rd Maye0
Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
jassid infestatione1
Direction
considerably highere0
Setting
Bahteeme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was considerably higher still on the plants sown later, on 3rd May (at Bahteem).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2194–2274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“jassid infestation was markedly reduced on the second date of sowing, on 25th March (at both Abouzabaal and Shoubra).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jassid infestation decreased as cotton leaf hair density increased.

Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jassid infestation‐averagese0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
hair‐densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a general tendency in the jassid infestation‐averages to decrease which the increase in hair‐density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf hair density conferred resistance only when hairs extended to lower leaf veins.

Organ / stage
cotton leavese0
Interactor
Empoasca spp.Empoascat1pest
Outcome
resistancee0
Qualifier
unless the dens hairs extend to the mid‐rib and other veins on the lower surfaces of the leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hairiness could hardly be regarded as a primary to characteristic of resistance in the cotton leaves unless the dens hairs extend to the mid‐rib and other veins on the lower surfaces of the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2581–2782 · show in text ↑
t1

“Empoasca spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hair length in the tested range had no apparent role in jassid resistance.

Interactor
jassidse0pest
Outcome
resistance to jassidse0
Value
514.3 μ‐690.1 μe0
Qualifier
hair‐lengthse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hair‐lengths within the ranges common on the tested varieties (514.3 μ‐690.1 μ) had apparently no significance in the mechanism of resistance to jassids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2786–2943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑