Paper · 2006 · Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

Relationship between yield and some yield components in cowpea varieties infected with two cowpea potyviruses

Macauley A Ittah

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bean common mosaic virus–blackeye cowpea strain (BCMV-BlC) and cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus (CABMV) belonging to the genus potyvirus are cosmopolitan and economically important pathogens of cowpea. This study analysed the linear relationship between yield and some yield related characters (numbers of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, pod growth rate, etc) in 15 cowpea lines infected with BCMV-BlC and CABMV. Isolates of the viruses were mechanically inoculated into the cowpea lines; as a result of the effect of viruses, the cowpea lines were categorized as highly resistant, tolerant, susceptible and highly susceptible. The linear associations between yield and other characters in resistant and tolerant varieties were similar to the associations in susceptible and highly susceptible varieties. The similarity in the correlation coefficient regardless of the susceptibility status was caused by systemic spread of infections in susceptible cowpea varieties such that organs were uniformly reduced while there was minimal reduction in tolerant and no reduction in highly resistant varieties. Pod growth rate correlated (p > 0.05) positively and highly with the yield in seven susceptible varieties and in 5 of the 8 resistant varieties infected by CABMV and BCMV-BlC and the relationship between disease severity and yield showed that as disease severity increased cowpea yield decreased. BCMV-BlC reduced the seed yield between 62 to 87% and CABMV between 54 to 87% in some cowpea varieties. Keywords: cowpea, potyvirus, virus infection, correlation, plant disease Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences Vol. 12(1) 2006: 11-17

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cowpea lines were categorized across resistance and susceptibility classes.

Outcome
categorized as highly resistant, tolerant, susceptible and highly susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cowpea lines were categorized as highly resistant, tolerant, susceptible and highly susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–635 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield character associations were similar across resistant or tolerant and susceptible cowpea varieties.

Material
resistant and tolerant varietiese0
Outcome
linear associations between yield and other characterse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
susceptible and highly susceptible varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The linear associations between yield and other characters in resistant and tolerant varieties were similar to the associations in susceptible and highly susceptible varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea varieties infected with two cowpea potyviruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–109 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic infection in susceptible cowpea varieties uniformly reduced organs, with minimal reduction in tolerant and none in highly resistant varieties.

Outcome
organs were uniformly reducede0
Qualifier
systemic spread of infectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“systemic spread of infections in susceptible cowpea varieties such that organs were uniformly reduced while there was minimal reduction in tolerant and no reduction in highly resistant varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod growth rate correlated positively and highly with yield in seven susceptible and five of eight resistant cowpea varieties.

Organ / stage
Pode0
Interactor
CABMVCowpea aphid-borne mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pod growth rate correlated (p > 0.05) positively and highly with the yield in seven susceptible varieties and in 5 of the 8 resistant varieties infected by CABMV and BCMV-BlC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea varieties infected with two cowpea potyviruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield decreased as disease severity increased.

Treatment
disease severity increasede0
Outcome
cowpea yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as disease severity increased cowpea yield decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCMV-BlC reduced seed yield by 62 to 87% in some cowpea varieties.

Treatment
mechanically inoculatede1
Interactor
BCMV-BlCe0pathogen
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62 to 87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BCMV-BlC reduced the seed yield between 62 to 87% and CABMV between 54 to 87% in some cowpea varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1509 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isolates of the viruses were mechanically inoculated into the cowpea lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CABMV reduced seed yield by 54 to 87% in some cowpea varieties.

Treatment
mechanically inoculatede1
Interactor
CABMVCowpea aphid-borne mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54 to 87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BCMV-BlC reduced the seed yield between 62 to 87% and CABMV between 54 to 87% in some cowpea varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1509 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isolates of the viruses were mechanically inoculated into the cowpea lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–495 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 99 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.