Paper · 1986 · Annals of Applied Biology

Prevention of rice tungro virus disease and control of the vector with granular insecticides

M. K. SATAPATHY; A. ANJANEYULU

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Thirteen granular insecticides were screened under glasshouse conditions for their ability to kill the vector, Nephotettix virescens , and to prevent tungro virus infection. Carbofuran, bendiocarb, isoprocarb, BPMC, disulfoton, mephosfolan and phorate caused 100% vector mortality, but only the first four reduced virus infection to an acceptable level; the remainder killing the vector too slowly to prevent virus transmission. Seven of these compounds were evaluated in the field on two test cultivars, Traichung Native 1 and Pankaj. Carbofuran, isoprocarb and BPMC gave acceptable control of the disease on both cultivars and diazinon on cv. Pankaj only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven insecticides caused complete vector mortality under glasshouse conditions.

Treatment
Carbofuran, bendiocarb, isoprocarb, BPMC, disulfoton, mephosfolan and phoratee0
Interactor
vectore0pest
Outcome
vector mortalitye0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran, bendiocarb, isoprocarb, BPMC, disulfoton, mephosfolan and phorate caused 100% vector mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran, bendiocarb, isoprocarb and BPMC reduced tungro infection to an acceptable level.

Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
virus infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but only the first four reduced virus infection to an acceptable level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–360 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining vector-killing insecticides acted too slowly to prevent virus transmission.

Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
virus transmissione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the remainder killing the vector too slowly to prevent virus transmission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran, isoprocarb and BPMC gave acceptable disease control on both tested cultivars in the field.

Material
both cultivarse0
Treatment
Carbofuran, isoprocarb and BPMCe0
Outcome
control of the diseasee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbofuran, isoprocarb and BPMC gave acceptable control of the disease on both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diazinon gave acceptable disease control only on Pankaj.

Material
Pankaje0
Treatment
diazinone0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diazinon on cv. Pankaj only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–18 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fenobucarb · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Mephosfolan · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phorate · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carbofuran · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.