Paper · 2008 · Agronomy Journal

Timing of Maturity in Ultra‐Narrow and Conventional Row Cotton as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate

Ernest L. Clawson; J. Tom Cothren; David C. Blouin; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ultra‐narrow row (UNR) systems and N fertilizer can influence cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) crop maturation. Study objectives were to measure impacts of UNR systems and N fertilizer rates on cotton maturation and to identify mechanisms by which these effects occurred. The location was Burleson County, Texas. In the split plot design, whole plots were N rates of 0, 50, 101, and 151 kg ha −1 . Split plots were 19‐, 38‐ (both UNR), and 76‐cm (conventional row, CR) row spacings with 296,600, 195,400, and 136,300 plants ha −1 , respectively. Thirty, 60, and 85% harvestable seedcotton each occurred 1.5 to 2.9 d earlier in UNR than CR spacings. First boll set occurred 1 d later in 19‐cm than in wider row spacings. Boll set rate m −2 was greater in 19‐ than 76‐cm row spacing during a 5‐d flowering period shortly after first boll set, but did not differ by row spacing during three flowering periods thereafter. The percentage first position bolls was lower with wider row spacing, suggesting greater potential for concurrent boll set at multiple sites on individual plants. Eventual development of nonfirst position fruiting sites in 76‐cm row spacing may have contributed to confinement of faster boll set in 19‐cm row spacing to early bloom. Nitrogen rates did not affect the timing of 30, 60, or 85% harvest. Reductions in bolls plant −1 were counteracted by slower boll set rates with lower N. The limited observed interactions of N and row spacing do not suggest advantages from suboptimal N rates in UNR cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty, 60, and 85% harvestable seedcotton occurred 1.5 to 2.9 days earlier in ultra-narrow than conventional rows.

Treatment
UNRe0
Outcome
harvestable seedcottone0
Direction
earliere0
Value
1.5 to 2.9 de0
Comparator
CR spacingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thirty, 60, and 85% harvestable seedcotton each occurred 1.5 to 2.9 d earlier in UNR than CR spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First boll set occurred one day later in 19 cm than wider rows.

Treatment
19‐cme0
Outcome
First boll sete0
Direction
latere0
Value
1 de0
Comparator
wider row spacingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First boll set occurred 1 d later in 19‐cm than in wider row spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–717 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll set rate was greater in 19 cm than 76 cm rows during early flowering.

Treatment
19‐e0
Outcome
Boll set rate m −2e0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
during a 5‐d flowering period shortly after first boll sete0
Comparator
76‐cm row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boll set rate m −2 was greater in 19‐ than 76‐cm row spacing during a 5‐d flowering period shortly after first boll set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll set rate did not differ by row spacing in three later flowering periods.

Treatment
row spacinge0
Outcome
Boll set rate m −2e1
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not differ by row spacing during three flowering periods thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–915 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boll set rate m −2 was greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–749 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage of first-position bolls was lower at wider row spacing.

Treatment
wider row spacinge0
Outcome
percentage first position bollse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage first position bolls was lower with wider row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate did not affect timing of 30, 60, or 85% harvest.

Treatment
Nitrogen ratese0
Outcome
timing of 30, 60, or 85% harveste0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen rates did not affect the timing of 30, 60, or 85% harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1316 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen reduced bolls per plant.

Treatment
lower Ne0
Outcome
bolls plant −1e0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in bolls plant −1 were counteracted by slower boll set rates with lower N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1402 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen slowed boll set rates.

Treatment
lower Ne0
Outcome
boll set ratese0
Direction
slowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in bolls plant −1 were counteracted by slower boll set rates with lower N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1402 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Observed interactions did not suggest an advantage from suboptimal nitrogen in ultra-narrow cotton.

Outcome
do not suggest advantages from suboptimal N rates in UNR cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The limited observed interactions of N and row spacing do not suggest advantages from suboptimal N rates in UNR cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1522 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 130 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 286 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.