Paper · 2001 · Applied Vegetation Science

Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments: The relative contribution of grazing and climatic variability

Samuel D. Fuhlendorf; David D. Briske; Fred E. Smeins

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
168
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. A 44‐yr record of herbaceous vegetation change was analysed for three contrasting grazing regimes within a semi‐arid savanna to evaluate the relative contribution of confined livestock grazing and climatic variability as agents of vegetation change. Grazing intensity had a significant, directional effect on the relative composition of short‐ and mid‐grass response groups; their composition was significantly correlated with time since the grazing regimes were established. Interannual precipitation was not significantly correlated with response group composition. However, interannual precipitation was significantly correlated with total plant basal area while time since imposition of grazing regimes was not, but both interannual precipitation and time since the grazing regimes were established were significantly correlated with total plant density. Vegetation change was reversible even though the herbaceous community had been maintained in an altered state for ca. 60 yr by intensive livestock grazing. However, ca. 25 yr were required for the mid‐grass response group to recover following the elimination of grazing and recovery occurred intermittently. The increase in mid‐grass composition was associated with a significant decrease in total plant density and an increase in mean individual plant basal area. Therefore, we failed to reject the hypotheses based on the proportional change in relative response group composition with grazing intensity and the distinct effects of grazing and climatic variability on response group composition, total basal area and plant density. Long‐term vegetation change indicates that grazing intensity established the long‐term directional change in response group composition, but that episodic climate events defined the short‐term rate and trajectory of this change and determines the upper limit on total basal area. The occurrence of both directional and non‐directional vegetation responses were largely a function of (1) the unique responses of the various community attributes monitored and (2) the distinct temporal responses of these community attributes to grazing and climatic variation. This interpretation supports previous conclusions that individual ecosystems may exist in equilibrial and non‐equilibrial states at various temporal and spatial scales.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing intensity had a significant, directional effect on the relative composition of short- and mid-grass response groups.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
Grazing intensitye0
Outcome
relative compositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grazing intensity had a significant, directional effect on the relative composition of short‐ and mid‐grass response groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–383 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interannual precipitation was not significantly correlated with response group composition.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
Interannual precipitatione1
Outcome
response group compositione1
Direction
not significantly correlatede1

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Interannual precipitation was not significantly correlated with response group composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–576 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interannual precipitation was significantly correlated with total plant basal area.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
interannual precipitatione2
Outcome
total plant basal areae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“interannual precipitation was significantly correlated with total plant basal area while time since imposition of grazing regimes was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–724 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Time since imposition of grazing regimes was not correlated with total plant basal area.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
time since imposition of grazing regimese2
Outcome
total plant basal areae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“interannual precipitation was significantly correlated with total plant basal area while time since imposition of grazing regimes was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–724 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interannual precipitation was significantly correlated with total plant density.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
interannual precipitatione3
Outcome
total plant densitye3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“both interannual precipitation and time since the grazing regimes were established were significantly correlated with total plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–867 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Time since the grazing regimes were established was significantly correlated with total plant density.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
time since the grazing regimes were establishede3
Outcome
total plant densitye3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“both interannual precipitation and time since the grazing regimes were established were significantly correlated with total plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–867 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Response group composition was significantly correlated with time since the grazing regimes were established.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
time since the grazing regimes were establishede4
Outcome
compositione4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“their composition was significantly correlated with time since the grazing regimes were established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–484 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation change was reversible under intensive livestock grazing.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
intensive livestock grazinge5
Outcome
Vegetation change was reversiblee5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“Vegetation change was reversible even though the herbaceous community had been maintained in an altered state for ca. 60 yr by intensive livestock grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1023 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mid-grass response group took about 25 years to recover after grazing was eliminated.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
elimination of grazinge6
Outcome
recovere6
Value
ca. 25 yre6

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“ca. 25 yr were required for the mid‐grass response group to recover following the elimination of grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of the mid-grass response group occurred intermittently.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Outcome
recoverye7
Qualifier
intermittentlye7

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“recovery occurred intermittently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1175 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in mid-grass composition was associated with a significant decrease in total plant density.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
mid‐grass compositione6
Outcome
total plant densitye6
Direction
decreasee6

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“The increase in mid‐grass composition was associated with a significant decrease in total plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1280 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in mid-grass composition was associated with an increase in mean individual plant basal area.

Taxon
herbaceous vegetationt0
Treatment
mid‐grass compositione6
Outcome
mean individual plant basal areae7
Direction
increasee7

Verbatim

t0

“Herbaceous vegetation change in variable rangeland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“The increase in mid‐grass composition was associated with a significant decrease in total plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1280 · show in text ↑
e7

“an increase in mean individual plant basal area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1332 · show in text ↑