Paper · 1995 · Genetics

New rust resistance specificities associated with recombination in the Rp1 complex in maize.

T E Richter; T J Pryor; J L Bennetzen; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
154
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We address the question of whether genetic reassortment events, including unequal crossing over and gene conversion, at the Rp1 complex are capable of generating novel resistance specificities that were not present in the parents. Some 176 events involving genetic reassortment within the Rp1 complex were screened for novel resistance specificities with a set of 11 different rust biotypes. Most (150/176) of the events were susceptible to all tested rust biotypes, providing no evidence for new specificities. Eleven events selected as double-resistant recombinants, when screened with the 11 test biotypes, showed the combined resistance of the two parental types consistent with a simple recombination and pyramiding of the parental resistances. Nine events selected either as having partial resistance or complete susceptibility to a single biotype possessed resistance to a subset of the biotypes that the parents were resistant to, suggesting segregation of resistance genes present in the parental Rp1 complex. Four events gave rise to novel specificities being resistant to at least one rust biotype to which both parents were susceptible. All four had flanking marker exchange, demonstrating that crossing over within the Rp1 complex is associated with the appearance of new rust resistance specificities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most reassortment events were susceptible to all tested rust biotypes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
rust biotypese0pathogen
Outcome
susceptible to all tested rust biotypese0
Value
150/176e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most (150/176) of the events were susceptible to all tested rust biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven double-resistant recombinants combined parental resistance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
test biotypese0pathogen
Outcome
combined resistance of the two parental typese0
Value
Eleven eventse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eleven events selected as double-resistant recombinants, when screened with the 11 test biotypes, showed the combined resistance of the two parental types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine events retained resistance to a subset of parental rust biotypes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
biotypese0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to a subset of the biotypese0
Value
Nine eventse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine events selected either as having partial resistance or complete susceptibility to a single biotype possessed resistance to a subset of the biotypes that the parents were resistant to”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four events acquired novel rust resistance specificities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
rust biotypee0pathogen
Outcome
novel specificitiese0
Value
Four eventse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four events gave rise to novel specificities being resistant to at least one rust biotype to which both parents were susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four novel-specificity events had flanking marker exchange.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Gene
Rp1 complexe0
Outcome
appearance of new rust resistance specificitiese0
Qualifier
flanking marker exchangee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All four had flanking marker exchange, demonstrating that crossing over within the Rp1 complex is associated with the appearance of new rust resistance specificities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–92 · show in text ↑