Paper · 2011 · JOURNAL OF HUNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

Effect of cutting density on qualities of cutting plant for low branches of ramie

Zai-xin HE; Gui-yuan MENG; Huan-liang SUN; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four ramie varieties were selected as materials to investigate the correlation between cutting density of low branches and the following properties:survival rate,dry root weight,stem height recruitment,dry leaf weight and branch characteristics.Significant negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and dry root weight,stem height recruitment,dry leaf weight,branch length.Negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and quantities of branches,dry branche weight.And a significant positive correlation existed between the density and the lowest branch.No significant correlation was found between different varieties.Taking all the factors into consideration,it was learned that the optimum cutting density should be about 10 cm×10 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting density correlated negatively with dry root weight.

Treatment
cutting densitye0
Outcome
dry root weighte0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and dry root weight,stem height recruitment,dry leaf weight,branch length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting density correlated negatively with stem height recruitment.

Treatment
cutting densitye0
Outcome
stem height recruitmente0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and dry root weight,stem height recruitment,dry leaf weight,branch length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting density correlated negatively with dry leaf weight.

Treatment
cutting densitye0
Outcome
dry leaf weighte0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and dry root weight,stem height recruitment,dry leaf weight,branch length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting density correlated negatively with branch length.

Treatment
cutting densitye0
Outcome
branch lengthe0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and dry root weight,stem height recruitment,dry leaf weight,branch length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting density correlated negatively with quantities of branches.

Treatment
cutting densitye0
Outcome
quantities of branchese0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and quantities of branches,dry branche weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–503 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting density correlated negatively with dry branche weight.

Treatment
cutting densitye0
Outcome
dry branche weighte0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“Negative correlation could be observed between cutting density and quantities of branches,dry branche weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–503 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting density correlated positively with the lowest branch.

Treatment
densitye0
Outcome
the lowest branche0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“And a significant positive correlation existed between the density and the lowest branch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–592 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different varieties showed no significant correlation.

Material
different varietiese0
Outcome
correlatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant correlation was found between different varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–657 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended optimum cutting density was about 10 cm×10 cm.

Outcome
optimum cutting densitye0
Value
about 10 cm×10 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Boehmeria nivea
Boehmeria nivea · TaxonSphl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ramie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“the optimum cutting density should be about 10 cm×10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–774 · show in text ↑