Paper · 2014 · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH

EFFECT OF TILLAGE AND SOWING METHODS ON WEED BIOMASS AND MUNGBEAN YIELD UNDER IRRIGATED CONDITIONS

Mohammad Mehdi Amin; Mohammad Jamal Khan; M. T. Jan; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to find the effect of tillage practices and sowing methods on weed biomass, biological and grain yield of mungbean under irrigated conditions at the Research Farm of the University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan during 2011. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with split plot arrangement and replicated four times. Tillage was assigned to main plots which consisted of tine cultivator twice (TC-2), farmer tillage practices, chisel plow (CR), mouldboard plow (MR), disc plow (DR) and tine cultivator (TCR) each followed by rotavator; while sowing methods consist of single box seed drill (SD), combined drill (CD) and broadcast (BC) allotted to sub plots. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that tillage practices had a significant effect on fresh and dry weed biomass and grain yield of mungbean. Similarly, sowing methods showed significant effect on weed biomass, biological and grain yield of mungbean. Minimum fresh and dry weed biomass (323 and 143 g m -2 ) and maximum biological yield of 5253 kg ha -1 were recorded in plots plowed with MR tillage practices. While, maximum grain yield of 959 kg ha -1 was obtained with TCR tillage practices. Similarly, minimum weed biomass and maximum biological and grain yield of mungbean were recorded in plots of SD and CD sowing methods as compared to broadcast. Therefore, in order to reduce weed infestation in mungbean MR tillage practice and SD or CD sowing method should be used and for improving the biological and grain yields MR and TCR tillage in combination with CD or SD sowing method are best under irrigated condition of Peshawar in clay loam soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage significantly affected weed biomass and grain yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
fresh and dry weed biomass and grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage practices had a significant effect on fresh and dry weed biomass and grain yield of mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing methods significantly affected weed biomass and biological and grain yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
sowing methodse0
Outcome
weed biomass, biological and grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing methods showed significant effect on weed biomass, biological and grain yield of mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MR gave minimum fresh and dry weed biomass.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
MR tillage practicese0
Outcome
fresh and dry weed biomasse0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
323 and 143 g m -2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum fresh and dry weed biomass (323 and 143 g m -2 ) and maximum biological yield of 5253 kg ha -1 were recorded in plots plowed with MR tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MR gave maximum biological yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
MR tillage practicese0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5253 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum biological yield of 5253 kg ha -1 were recorded in plots plowed with MR tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TCR gave maximum grain yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
TCR tillage practicese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
959 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum grain yield of 959 kg ha -1 was obtained with TCR tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SD and CD reduced weed biomass versus broadcast.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
SD and CD sowing methodse0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
broadcaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum weed biomass and maximum biological and grain yield of mungbean were recorded in plots of SD and CD sowing methods as compared to broadcast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SD and CD gave maximum biological and grain yield versus broadcast.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
SD and CD sowing methodse0
Outcome
biological and grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
broadcaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum weed biomass and maximum biological and grain yield of mungbean were recorded in plots of SD and CD sowing methods as compared to broadcast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend MR and SD or CD for weed control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
MR tillage practice and SD or CD sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in order to reduce weed infestation in mungbean MR tillage practice and SD or CD sowing method should be used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend MR and TCR with CD or SD to improve yields.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
MR and TCR tillage in combination with CD or SD sowing methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for improving the biological and grain yields MR and TCR tillage in combination with CD or SD sowing method are best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUNGBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

transplanting · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.