Paper · 1997 · American Journal of Botany

Microgeographic genetic structure and gene flow in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae) populations

Hiroshi Kudoh; Dennis F. Whigham

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
90
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Microgeographic genetic variation in populations of a wetland macrophyte, Hibiscus moscheutos L. (Malvaceae), was investigated using allozyme polymorphism. The species is a self-compatible insect-pollinated perennial, and seeds are water dispersed (hydrochory). Six hundred plants were analyzed from eight brackish and two freshwater populations within the Rhode River watershed/estuarine system. The genetic structure of the populations was assessed by fixation indices and spatial autocorrelation analyses. The degree of genetic differentiation among sites and gene flow between all paired combinations of sites (M ) was analyzed using three hypothetical gene flow models. Fixation indices indicated almost complete panmixia within populations, and spatial autocorrelations showed that genotypes were randomly distributed within sites, most likely the result of water dispersal of seeds. Allele frequencies were significantly different among sites, and estimated FST indicated moderate genetic differentiation (_ = 0.062). Genetic differences between populations were mostly explained by a gene flow model that accounted for the location of populations relative to the tidal stream. The importance of hydrochory in affecting spatial genetic structure was thus suggested both within and among H. moscheutos populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fixation indices indicated almost complete panmixia within Hibiscus populations.

Taxon
Hibiscus moscheutosMuenchhusia moscheutost0
Outcome
almost complete panmixia within populationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Muenchhusia moscheutos
Muenchhusia moscheutos · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fixation indices indicated almost complete panmixia within populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hibiscus moscheutos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes were randomly distributed within Hibiscus sites.

Taxon
Hibiscus moscheutosMuenchhusia moscheutost0
Outcome
genotypes were randomly distributed within sitese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Muenchhusia moscheutos
Muenchhusia moscheutos · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spatial autocorrelations showed that genotypes were randomly distributed within sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hibiscus moscheutos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Allele frequencies differed significantly among Hibiscus sites.

Taxon
Hibiscus moscheutosMuenchhusia moscheutost0
Outcome
Allele frequenciese0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Muenchhusia moscheutos
Muenchhusia moscheutos · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Allele frequencies were significantly different among sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hibiscus moscheutos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated FST indicated moderate genetic differentiation of 0.062.

Taxon
Hibiscus moscheutosMuenchhusia moscheutost0
Outcome
moderate genetic differentiatione0
Value
0.062e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Muenchhusia moscheutos
Muenchhusia moscheutos · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“estimated FST indicated moderate genetic differentiation (_ = 0.062)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hibiscus moscheutos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A gene flow model accounting for tidal stream location explained most genetic differences among populations.

Taxon
Hibiscus moscheutosMuenchhusia moscheutost0
Outcome
Genetic differences between populationse0
Comparator
location of populations relative to the tidal streame0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Muenchhusia moscheutos
Muenchhusia moscheutos · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic differences between populations were mostly explained by a gene flow model that accounted for the location of populations relative to the tidal stream.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hibiscus moscheutos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested water dispersal affects spatial genetic structure within and among Hibiscus populations.

Taxon
H. moscheutosMuenchhusia moscheutose0
Outcome
spatial genetic structuree0
Qualifier
hydrochorye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Muenchhusia moscheutos
Muenchhusia moscheutos · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The importance of hydrochory in affecting spatial genetic structure was thus suggested both within and among H. moscheutos populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1320 · show in text ↑