Paper · 2015 · New Disease Reports

Necrotic streak disease of tomato in Florida caused by a new ilarvirus species related to Tulare apple mosaic virus

S. Adkins; C.A. Baker; I.E. Badillo‐Vargas; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

During surveys for the emerging tospoviruses Tomato chlorotic spot virus (TCSV) and Groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV), virus-like necrosis of leaves, petioles and stems (Fig. 1), and necrotic rings or spots on fruits (Fig. 2) of fresh market tomato plants were observed in south (Miami-Dade County) and southeast (Palm Beach County) Florida beginning in October 2013. Incidence of plants with symptoms was generally less than 3% but in some fields was considerably higher. More than 1000 plants were rogued on a single farm in Miami-Dade County during the fall 2013 season. Total RNA was extracted from representative samples using a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and tested for TCSV, GRSV and Tomato spotted wilt virus by RT-PCR as previously described (Webster et al., 5). When no products were amplified, nine virus/viroid genera or groups, and an additional ten virus species including the ilarviruses Tobacco streak virus (TSV) and Tomato necrotic spot virus (ToNSV; Batuman et al., 2) were assayed by RT-PCR and/or DAS-ELISA (Agdia, Inc., Elkhart, IN) all with negative results. Light microscopic examination for inclusion bodies revealed no known virus-induced structures. Symptomatic tomato plant tissue was used to mechanically inoculate tomato plants, and symptoms of leaf, petiole and stem necrosis similar to those observed in the original field samples developed in the inoculated tomato plants. Ultimately, a 412 bp fragment (GenBank Accession No. KP861233) was amplified from total RNA by RT-PCR using ilarvirus primers provided by Agdia, Inc. Sequence analysis indicated that the nucleotide (nt) and deduced amino acid (aa) sequences of the fragment were 68 to 80% and 67 to 83% identical, respectively, to RNA1 and the replicase protein 1a of subgroup 2 ilarviruses with considerably less identity to other previously reported subgroup 1 tomato-infecting ilarviruses including TSV (54% nt, 43% aa) and Parietaria mottle virus (49% nt, 46% aa; Galipienso et al., 3). Thus, primers were designed from conserved regions of available RNA3 sequences of subgroup 2 ilarviruses [Asparagus virus 2, Citrus leaf rugose virus, Citrus variegation virus, Elm mottle virus, Spinach latent virus and Tulare apple mosaic virus (TAMV)] and used to amplify the movement protein (MP) and coat protein (CP) genes. Sequence analysis showed that the MP and CP genes (KP861234 and KP861235) were most closely related to, but distinct from, TAMV at 79 and 83% identity, respectively. Deduced MP and CP aa sequences were 76 and 77% identical, respectively, to those of TAMV. These results indicate that the tomato symptoms initially observed in Florida in fall 2013, and subsequently in spring and fall 2014, are caused by a new subgroup 2 ilarvirus species, for which the name Tomato necrotic streak virus (TomNSV) is proposed. Potential TomNSV transmission by pollen, seed and/or insect vectors that may include thrips similar to other ilarviruses (Sdoodee & Teakle, 4; Aramburu et al., 1) is not currently known and requires additional research. The authors would like to thank Carrie Vanderspool, Jason Skaryd, Shelby Hanson and Rita Noel for their excellent technical assistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants displayed necrosis of leaves, petioles and stems and necrotic fruit rings or spots in Florida.

Organ / stage
leaves, petioles and stemse0
Outcome
virus-like necrosis of leaves, petioles and stemse0
Setting
Floridae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“virus-like necrosis of leaves, petioles and stems (Fig. 1), and necrotic rings or spots on fruits (Fig. 2) of fresh market tomato plants were observed in south (Miami-Dade County) and southeast (Palm Beach County) Florida beginning in October 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–364 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incidence of symptomatic tomato plants was generally below 3%, though higher in some fields.

Outcome
Incidence of plants with symptomse0
Direction
less thane0
Value
3%e0
Qualifier
in some fields was considerably highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incidence of plants with symptoms was generally less than 3% but in some fields was considerably higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–469 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than 1000 symptomatic tomato plants were removed on one Miami-Dade farm.

Outcome
plants were roguede0
Value
More than 1000 plantse0
Setting
Miami-Dade Countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More than 1000 plants were rogued on a single farm in Miami-Dade County during the fall 2013 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The surveyed tomato samples tested negative for the assayed viruses and viroids.

Outcome
negative resultse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine virus/viroid genera or groups, and an additional ten virus species including the ilarviruses Tobacco streak virus (TSV) and Tomato necrotic spot virus (ToNSV; Batuman et al., 2) were assayed by RT-PCR and/or DAS-ELISA (Agdia, Inc., Elkhart, IN) all with negative results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical inoculation with symptomatic tomato tissue reproduced leaf, petiole and stem necrosis in tomato.

Treatment
mechanically inoculate tomato plantse0
Outcome
symptoms of leaf, petiole and stem necrosise0
Comparator
original field samplese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symptomatic tomato plant tissue was used to mechanically inoculate tomato plants, and symptoms of leaf, petiole and stem necrosis similar to those observed in the original field samples developed in the inoculated tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An ilarvirus RNA fragment in symptomatic tomato was 68 to 80% identical in nucleotide sequence to subgroup 2 ilarviruses.

Interactor
subgroup 2 ilarvirusese0pathogen
Outcome
nucleotide (nt)e0
Value
68 to 80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nucleotide (nt) and deduced amino acid (aa) sequences of the fragment were 68 to 80% and 67 to 83% identical, respectively, to RNA1 and the replicase protein 1a of subgroup 2 ilarviruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1795 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The deduced amino acid sequence of the fragment was 67 to 83% identical to subgroup 2 ilarviruses.

Interactor
subgroup 2 ilarvirusese0pathogen
Outcome
deduced amino acid (aa) sequencese0
Value
67 to 83%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deduced amino acid (aa) sequences of the fragment were 68 to 80% and 67 to 83% identical, respectively, to RNA1 and the replicase protein 1a of subgroup 2 ilarviruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1795 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The virus movement protein gene was 79% identical to Tulare apple mosaic virus.

Interactor
TAMVTulare apple mosaic viruse0pathogen
Gene
MPe0
Outcome
identitye0
Value
79e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MP and CP genes (KP861234 and KP861235) were most closely related to, but distinct from, TAMV at 79 and 83% identity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2359–2489 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The virus coat protein gene was 83% identical to Tulare apple mosaic virus.

Interactor
TAMVTulare apple mosaic viruse0pathogen
Gene
CPe0
Outcome
identitye0
Value
83%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MP and CP genes (KP861234 and KP861235) were most closely related to, but distinct from, TAMV at 79 and 83% identity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2359–2489 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The virus movement protein amino acid sequence was 76% identical to TAMV.

Interactor
TAMVTulare apple mosaic viruse0pathogen
Gene
MPe0
Outcome
aa sequencese0
Value
76e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deduced MP and CP aa sequences were 76 and 77% identical, respectively, to those of TAMV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2491–2579 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The virus coat protein amino acid sequence was 77% identical to TAMV.

Interactor
TAMVTulare apple mosaic viruse0pathogen
Gene
CPe0
Outcome
aa sequencese0
Value
77%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deduced MP and CP aa sequences were 76 and 77% identical, respectively, to those of TAMV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2491–2579 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tomato necrotic streak disease was attributed to a new subgroup 2 ilarvirus named Tomato necrotic streak virus.

Interactor
Tomato necrotic streak virus (TomNSV)Tomato necrotic streak viruse0pathogen
Outcome
tomato symptomse0
Setting
Floridae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato symptoms initially observed in Florida in fall 2013, and subsequently in spring and fall 2014, are caused by a new subgroup 2 ilarvirus species, for which the name Tomato necrotic streak virus (TomNSV) is proposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2613–2833 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 136 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.