Paper · 2015 · Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia)

Leaf lesion classification (LLC) algorithm based on artificial bee colony (ABC)

Faudziah Ahmad; Ku Ruhana Ku‐Mahamud; Mohd Shamrie Sainin; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In this paper, an algorithm to classify leaf disease severity based on lesions is presented. The algorithm involved three main steps, filtration, recognition and detection.Artificial Bee Colony, Fuzzy Logic, Otsu and Geometry formula were incorporated to achieve the goal.Ninety-four leaf images were used in this algorithm combination experiment.The study was conducted in four phases, filtration, recognition, detection and evaluation.Comparison was made with four other algorithms, Otsu, Canny, Robert and Sobel. Results showed that the Leaf Lesion Classification (LLC) algorithm based on Artificial Bee colony (ABC) produced an average 96.83% of accuracy and average 1.66 milliseconds of processing time, indicating that LLC algorithm is better than algorithm such as Otsu, Canny, Roberts and Sobel. The study makes a substantial contribution to the body of knowledge in image processing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LLC achieved average accuracy of 96.83% for leaf lesion classification.

Outcome
accuracye0
Value
96.83%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Lesion Classification (LLC) algorithm based on Artificial Bee colony (ABC) produced an average 96.83% of accuracy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–658 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LLC averaged 1.66 milliseconds processing time.

Outcome
processing timee0
Value
1.66 millisecondse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“average 1.66 milliseconds of processing time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–707 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LLC performed better than Otsu, Canny, Roberts and Sobel.

Outcome
bettere0
Comparator
Otsu, Canny, Roberts and Sobele0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“LLC algorithm is better than algorithm such as Otsu, Canny, Roberts and Sobel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–802 · show in text ↑