Paper · 2006

YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE UNDER STACKING AND NON-STACKING CONDITIONS WITH DIFFERENT NITROGEN FERTILIZATION

K M Shamsul Haque; Q. A. Khaliq; J. Aktar; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of nitrogen fertilizer on yielding ability of indigenous aromatic rice cultivars under stacking and non-stacking conditions. Rice cultivars were grown during Aman season, 2002. There were four cultivars, namely, Shakkorkhora, Chinigura, Kalijira and Kataribhog, each with three levels of nitrogen fertilizer (0, 60 and 120 kg N ha -1 ). At the time of heading the experimental plots were equally divided into two parts. The crop in the half of the plot was left on the fate of the nature and that in the other half of the plot was mechanically supported by stacking to prevent lodging. Under stacking condition with the application of 60 Kg N ha -1 the grain yields increased by 12%, 23%, 29% and 18% in Shakkorkhora, Chinigura, Kalijira and Kataribhog, respectively compared to control. With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1 . The grain yield increase under stacking condition was supported by the increase in the number of filled spikelets per panicle, 1000-grain weight and decrease in sterility. Under stacking condition even at high level of nitrogen (120 kg N ha -1 ) the number of filled grain per panicle and 1000-grain weight increased remarkably. The highest grain yield was observed in plants with 60 kg N ha -1 under non-stacking condition. Stacking increased grain yield remarkably. Kataribhog with 120 kg N ha -1 produced 3.7 t ha -1 grain yield when provided artificial stacking, which was 2 t ha -1 under non-stacking condition. Under stacking condition, the cultivars Shakkorkhora, Kalijira and Kataribhog showed their highest yielding ability at 120 kg N ha -1

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Shakkorkhora rose 12% over control.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Shakkorkhorae0
Treatment
60 Kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
Under stacking conditione0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under stacking condition with the application of 60 Kg N ha -1 the grain yields increased by 12%, 23%, 29% and 18% in Shakkorkhora, Chinigura, Kalijira and Kataribhog, respectively compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Chinigura rose 23% over control.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Chinigurae0
Treatment
60 Kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23%e0
Qualifier
Under stacking conditione0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under stacking condition with the application of 60 Kg N ha -1 the grain yields increased by 12%, 23%, 29% and 18% in Shakkorkhora, Chinigura, Kalijira and Kataribhog, respectively compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Kalijira rose 29% over control.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Kalijirae0
Treatment
60 Kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0
Qualifier
Under stacking conditione0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under stacking condition with the application of 60 Kg N ha -1 the grain yields increased by 12%, 23%, 29% and 18% in Shakkorkhora, Chinigura, Kalijira and Kataribhog, respectively compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking at 60 kg N ha-1, grain yield of Kataribhog rose 18% over control.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Kataribhoge0
Treatment
60 Kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18%e0
Qualifier
Under stacking conditione0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under stacking condition with the application of 60 Kg N ha -1 the grain yields increased by 12%, 23%, 29% and 18% in Shakkorkhora, Chinigura, Kalijira and Kataribhog, respectively compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–839 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Shakkorkhora rose 0.6% at 60 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Shakkorkhorae1
Treatment
60 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.6%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Chinigura rose 25% at 60 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Chinigurae1
Treatment
60 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
25%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Kalijira rose 18% at 60 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Kalijirae1
Treatment
60 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Kataribhog rose 11% at 60 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Kataribhoge1
Treatment
60 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Shakkorkhora rose 18% at 120 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Shakkorkhorae1
Treatment
120 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Chinigura rose 27% at 120 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Chinigurae1
Treatment
120 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
27%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Kalijira rose 35% at 120 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Kalijirae1
Treatment
120 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
35%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With stacking, yield of Kataribhog rose 80% at 120 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Kataribhoge1
Treatment
120 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
80%e1
Qualifier
With stackinge1

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“With stacking yield was increased by 0.6% in Shakkorkhora, 25% in Chinigura, 18% in Kalijira and 11% in Kataribhog at 60 kg N ha -1 and by 18% in Shakkorkhora, 27% in Chinigura, 35% in Kalijira and 80% in Kataribhog at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1074 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking, grain yield increase was associated with more filled spikelets per panicle and higher 1000-grain weight.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Treatment
stacking conditione2
Outcome
number of filled spikelets per panicle, 1000-grain weighte2
Direction
increasee2

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield increase under stacking condition was supported by the increase in the number of filled spikelets per panicle, 1000-grain weight and decrease in sterility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1247 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking, sterility decreased.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Treatment
stacking conditione2
Outcome
sterilitye2
Direction
decreasee2

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield increase under stacking condition was supported by the increase in the number of filled spikelets per panicle, 1000-grain weight and decrease in sterility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1247 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking at 120 kg N ha-1, the number of filled grain per panicle and 1000-grain weight increased.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Treatment
120 kg N ha -1e3
Outcome
number of filled grain per panicle and 1000-grain weighte3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
remarkablye3

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under stacking condition even at high level of nitrogen (120 kg N ha -1) the number of filled grain per panicle and 1000-grain weight increased remarkably”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1249–1404 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield was observed at 60 kg N ha-1 under non-stacking condition.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Treatment
60 kg N ha -1e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
non-stacking conditione4

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest grain yield was observed in plants with 60 kg N ha -1 under non-stacking condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kataribhog with stacking at 120 kg N ha-1 produced 3.7 t ha-1 grain yield, higher than 2 t ha-1 under non-stacking.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Kataribhoge5
Treatment
artificial stackinge5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
3.7 t ha -1e5
Qualifier
2 t ha -1e5
Comparator
non-stacking conditione5

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e5

“Kataribhog with 120 kg N ha -1 produced 3.7 t ha -1 grain yield when provided artificial stacking, which was 2 t ha -1 under non-stacking condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1692 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stacking, Shakkorkhora, Kalijira and Kataribhog showed their highest yielding ability at 120 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
AROMATIC RICEt0
Material
Shakkorkhora, Kalijira and Kataribhoge6
Treatment
120 kg N ha -1e6
Outcome
yielding abilitye6
Direction
higheste6

Verbatim

t0

“YIELDING ABILITY OF AROMATIC RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under stacking condition, the cultivars Shakkorkhora, Kalijira and Kataribhog showed their highest yielding ability at 120 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1827 · show in text ↑