Paper · 2013 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Study On Intercropping Leafy Vegetables With Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)

F Ahmed; MN Islam; Alom; et al.

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment on intercropping of okra and leafy vegetables was conducted at Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Joydebpur, Gazipur and Agricultural Research Station, Burirhat, Rangpur during Kharif-I season of 2010 and 2011 to find out suitable crop combination for higher productivity and economic return. Seven treatments viz., sole okra (50 cm × 40cm), okra 100% (in row) + red-amaranth 100% (broadcast), okra 100% (in row) + red-amaranth 75% (broadcast), okra 100% (in row) + leaf amaranth 100% (broadcast), okra 100% (in row) + leaf amaranth 75% (broadcast), okra 100% (in row) + jute as patshak 100% (broadcast), okra 100% (in row) + jute as patshak 75% (broadcast) were used. Intercropping reduced okra yield but total productivity increased due to additional yield of vegetables. In both the locations, sole okra produced the highest yields (15.82 t/ha at Joydebpur and 13.79 t/ha at Burirhat). Among the intercropping treatments, the highest okra yields (15.42 t/ha at Joydebpur and 12.64 t/ha at Burirhat) were obtained from okra 100%+ red amaranth 75% combination. The lowest okra yield (13.16 t/ha at Joydebpur and 11.75 t/ha at Burirhat) was recorded in okra 100% + jute as patshak 100% combination. The highest okra equivalent yield (23.00 t/ha) was recorded in okra 100% + red amaranth 100% at Joydebpur and in okra 100% + leaf amaranth 100% (21.79 t/ha) at Burirhat. These treatment combinations also gave the highest gross margin (Tk. 227180/ha at Joydebpur and Tk. 214600/ha at Burirhat) and benefit cost ratio (5.66 at Joydebpur and 5.58 at Burirhat). The results revealed that cent percent red amaranth (broadcast) or leaf amaranth intercropped with cent percent okra might be suitable combination for higher productivity and economic return at Joydebpur and Burirhat, respectively. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 38(1): 137-143, March 2013 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v38i1.15199

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced okra yield.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
okra yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced okra yield but total productivity increased due to additional yield of vegetables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased total productivity through additional vegetable yield.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
total productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced okra yield but total productivity increased due to additional yield of vegetables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole okra produced 15.82 t/ha, the highest yield at Joydebpur.

Treatment
sole okrae0
Outcome
highest yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.82 t/hae0
Setting
Joydebpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sole okra produced the highest yields (15.82 t/ha at Joydebpur and 13.79 t/ha at Burirhat).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole okra produced 13.79 t/ha, the highest yield at Burirhat.

Treatment
sole okrae0
Outcome
highest yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.79 t/hae0
Setting
Burirhate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sole okra produced the highest yields (15.82 t/ha at Joydebpur and 13.79 t/ha at Burirhat).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% red amaranth intercrop gave the highest intercrop okra yield at Joydebpur, 15.42 t/ha.

Treatment
okra 100%+ red amaranth 75% combinatione0
Outcome
highest okra yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.42 t/hae0
Setting
Joydebpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest okra yields (15.42 t/ha at Joydebpur and 12.64 t/ha at Burirhat) were obtained from okra 100%+ red amaranth 75% combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1096 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% red amaranth intercrop gave the highest intercrop okra yield at Burirhat, 12.64 t/ha.

Treatment
okra 100%+ red amaranth 75% combinatione0
Outcome
highest okra yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.64 t/hae0
Setting
Burirhate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest okra yields (15.42 t/ha at Joydebpur and 12.64 t/ha at Burirhat) were obtained from okra 100%+ red amaranth 75% combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1096 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% jute intercrop had the lowest okra yield at Joydebpur, 13.16 t/ha.

Treatment
okra 100% + jute as patshak 100% combinatione0
Outcome
okra yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13.16 t/hae0
Setting
Joydebpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest okra yield (13.16 t/ha at Joydebpur and 11.75 t/ha at Burirhat) was recorded in okra 100% + jute as patshak 100% combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% jute intercrop had the lowest okra yield at Burirhat, 11.75 t/ha.

Treatment
okra 100% + jute as patshak 100% combinatione0
Outcome
okra yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.75 t/hae0
Setting
Burirhate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest okra yield (13.16 t/ha at Joydebpur and 11.75 t/ha at Burirhat) was recorded in okra 100% + jute as patshak 100% combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Joydebpur, the full red amaranth intercrop had highest okra-equivalent yield, 23.00 t/ha.

Treatment
okra 100% + red amaranth 100%e0
Outcome
okra equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
23.00 t/hae0
Setting
Joydebpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest okra equivalent yield (23.00 t/ha) was recorded in okra 100% + red amaranth 100% at Joydebpur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1339 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Burirhat, the full leaf amaranth intercrop had highest okra-equivalent yield, 21.79 t/ha.

Treatment
okra 100% + leaf amaranth 100%e0
Value
21.79 t/hae0
Setting
Burirhate0

Not reportedOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in okra 100% + leaf amaranth 100% (21.79 t/ha) at Burirhat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1403 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Joydebpur, the selected intercrop had highest gross margin of Tk. 227180/ha.

Outcome
gross margine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Tk. 227180/hae0
Setting
Joydebpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatment combinations also gave the highest gross margin (Tk. 227180/ha at Joydebpur and Tk. 214600/ha at Burirhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Burirhat, the selected intercrop had highest gross margin of Tk. 214600/ha.

Outcome
gross margine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Tk. 214600/hae0
Setting
Burirhate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatment combinations also gave the highest gross margin (Tk. 227180/ha at Joydebpur and Tk. 214600/ha at Burirhat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Joydebpur, the selected intercrop had benefit cost ratio of 5.66.

Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Value
5.66e0
Setting
Joydebpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit cost ratio (5.66 at Joydebpur and 5.58 at Burirhat).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Burirhat, the selected intercrop had benefit cost ratio of 5.58.

Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Value
5.58e0
Setting
Burirhate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit cost ratio (5.66 at Joydebpur and 5.58 at Burirhat).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend full red amaranth intercropping with okra at Joydebpur.

Outcome
cent percent red amaranth (broadcast)e0
Setting
Joydebpure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cent percent red amaranth (broadcast) or leaf amaranth intercropped with cent percent okra might be suitable combination for higher productivity and economic return at Joydebpur and Burirhat, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1823 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend leaf amaranth intercropping with okra at Burirhat.

Outcome
leaf amaranth intercropped with cent percent okrae0
Setting
Burirhate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cent percent red amaranth (broadcast) or leaf amaranth intercropped with cent percent okra might be suitable combination for higher productivity and economic return at Joydebpur and Burirhat, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1823 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 25 positive, 21 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.