Paper · 1998 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Effect of 1‐Naphthaleneacetic Acid Concentrations and the Number of its Applications on the Yield Components, Yield and Fibre Properties of Egyptian Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.)

Z. M. Sawan; R. A. Sakr

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were performed in two successive seasons at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, on the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.). Cotton plants were sprayed with the growth regulator 1‐naphthaleneace acid (NAA) once (at 90 days), or twice (at 90 and 105 days) or thrice (90, 105 and 120 days) after sowing, during the square initiation and boiling stage at the concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 p.p.m. The volume of solution was the same for all treatments. 9601 ha −1 . The control plants were sprayed with water only. The effect of the previous treatments on yield components, cotton yield and fibre properties was studied. The application of NAA increased the number of opened bolls plant −1 , boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield plant −1 and seed cotton and lint yields ha −1 . The most significant effects were obtained with the 15 and 20 p.p.m. concentrations. Lint percentage, fibre length parameters and micronaire value were not significantly affected by NAA. Flat bundle strength was significantly affected by NAA but with no definite trend. The application of NAA twice or thrice tended to give the best results on yield components and cotton yield compared with one application. The results of this study suggested that 20 p.p.m. of NAA gave the best figures when applied twice on the Egyptian cotton plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA application increased the number of opened bolls per plant, boll weight and seed index of Egyptian cotton compared with water-sprayed controls.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 75e1
Treatment
application of NAAe2
Outcome
number of opened bolls plant −1 , boll weight, seed indexe2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
control plants were sprayed with water onlye7
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were performed in two successive seasons at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–218 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of NAA increased the number of opened bolls plant −1 , boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield plant −1 and seed cotton and lint yields ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–880 · show in text ↑
e7

“The control plants were sprayed with water only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA application increased seed cotton yield per plant and seed cotton and lint yields per hectare compared with water-sprayed controls.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 75e1
Treatment
application of NAAe2
Outcome
seed cotton yield plant −1 and seed cotton and lint yields ha −1e2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
control plants were sprayed with water onlye7
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were performed in two successive seasons at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–218 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of NAA increased the number of opened bolls plant −1 , boll weight, seed index, seed cotton yield plant −1 and seed cotton and lint yields ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–880 · show in text ↑
e7

“The control plants were sprayed with water only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint percentage, fibre length parameters and micronaire value of Egyptian cotton were not significantly affected by NAA.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 75e1
Treatment
NAAe4
Outcome
Lint percentage, fibre length parameters and micronaire valuee4
Direction
not significantly affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–218 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lint percentage, fibre length parameters and micronaire value were not significantly affected by NAA. Flat bundle strength was significantly affected by NAA but with no definite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat bundle strength of Egyptian cotton was significantly affected by NAA with no definite trend.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 75e1
Treatment
NAAe4
Outcome
Flat bundle strengthe4
Direction
no definite trende4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–218 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lint percentage, fibre length parameters and micronaire value were not significantly affected by NAA. Flat bundle strength was significantly affected by NAA but with no definite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying NAA twice or thrice tended to give better yield components and cotton yield than one application.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 75e1
Treatment
application of NAA twice or thricee5
Outcome
yield components and cotton yielde5
Direction
best resultse5
Qualifier
tended to givee5
Comparator
one applicatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–218 · show in text ↑
e5

“The application of NAA twice or thrice tended to give the best results on yield components and cotton yield compared with one application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 15 and 20 p.p.m. gave the most significant effects on Egyptian cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 75e1
Treatment
15 and 20 p.p.m. concentrationse3
Outcome
most significant effectse3
Direction
most significante3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–218 · show in text ↑
e3

“The most significant effects were obtained with the 15 and 20 p.p.m. concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 20 p.p.m. applied twice gave the best figures on Egyptian cotton plants.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 75e1
Treatment
20 p.p.m. of NAAe6
Outcome
best figurese6
Direction
best figurese6
Qualifier
when applied twicee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 75 ( Gossypium barbadense L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–218 · show in text ↑
e6

“20 p.p.m. of NAA gave the best figures when applied twice on the Egyptian cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1420 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.