Paper · 2009 · HortScience

Relating Objective and Subjective Ratings of Snap Bean Pod Color to Likelihood of Purchase

Brian A. Kahn; William G. McGlynn

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with pods representing a range of greenness were grown in Oklahoma field trials in 2001 and 2004. Objective color evaluations (L* value and hue angle) performed on raw and cooked pod samples from 10 (2001) or 12 (2004) of these cultivars indicated that color testing of raw snap bean pods may not be sufficient to determine the color after cooking. Although L* values may be expected to decrease after cooking, the magnitude of the changes may not be predictable. Changes in hue angle values after cooking appear to be even more variable among cultivars. Therefore, if the color of the cooked beans is expected to be a deciding factor in cultivar selection, we would recommend conducting color tests on cooked bean pods as well as the raw product. Twenty relatively straight, unblemished pods per cultivar were harvested on 20 June 2001 and on 30 June 2004 from plants of ‘Blue Lake 274’, ‘Brio’, ‘Charon’, ‘Jade’, and ‘Seville’. The five most uniform pods per cultivar (all sieve Size 4) were presented as raw samples that same day to an untrained panel consisting of seven males and 18 females (2001) or nine males and 18 females (2004). This was an affective test; panelists were asked to evaluate intensity of color and likeliness to buy using a 5-point semantic differential scale. Correlation coefficients for the two attributes were calculated. Sensory panelists were able to make subjective distinctions among the cultivars based on color. However, these differences did not necessarily correlate with either objective color measures or likelihood of purchase. Snap bean pod color is not an overriding selection criterion, but only one of many criteria considered by consumers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color testing of raw snap bean pods may not be sufficient to determine color after cooking

Taxon
Snap beane1
Outcome
color after cookinge2
Qualifier
color testing of raw snap bean pods may not be sufficient to determinee2

Verbatim

e1

“Snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with pods representing a range of greenness were grown in Oklahoma field trials in 2001 and 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“indicated that color testing of raw snap bean pods may not be sufficient to determine the color after cooking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–392 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of L* value changes after cooking may not be predictable

Taxon
Snap beane1
Outcome
magnitude of the changese3
Qualifier
may not be predictablee3

Verbatim

e1

“Snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with pods representing a range of greenness were grown in Oklahoma field trials in 2001 and 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e3

“Although L* values may be expected to decrease after cooking, the magnitude of the changes may not be predictable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hue angle changes after cooking were even more variable among cultivars

Taxon
Snap beane1
Outcome
Changes in hue angle values after cookinge4
Qualifier
even more variable among cultivarse4

Verbatim

e1

“Snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with pods representing a range of greenness were grown in Oklahoma field trials in 2001 and 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e4

“Changes in hue angle values after cooking appear to be even more variable among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–598 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Color tests should be conducted on cooked snap bean pods as well as raw product

Taxon
Snap beane1
Outcome
conducting color tests on cooked bean podse5

Verbatim

e1

“Snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with pods representing a range of greenness were grown in Oklahoma field trials in 2001 and 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e5

“we would recommend conducting color tests on cooked bean pods as well as the raw product”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensory panelists distinguished the cultivars by color

Taxon
Snap beane1
Outcome
subjective distinctionse6
Qualifier
among the cultivars based on colore6

Verbatim

e1

“Snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with pods representing a range of greenness were grown in Oklahoma field trials in 2001 and 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sensory panelists were able to make subjective distinctions among the cultivars based on color. However, these differences did not necessarily correlate with either objective color measures or likelihood of purchase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1612 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subjective color distinctions did not necessarily correlate with objective color measures or likelihood of purchase

Taxon
Snap beane1
Outcome
these differencese0
Direction
did not necessarily correlatee0
Comparator
objective color measurese0

Verbatim

e1

“Snap bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with pods representing a range of greenness were grown in Oklahoma field trials in 2001 and 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“these differences did not necessarily correlate with either objective color measures or likelihood of purchase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1612 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod color is not an overriding selection criterion for snap bean but only one of many consumer criteria

Taxon
Snap beane7
Outcome
selection criterione7
Qualifier
not an overriding selection criterion, but only one of many criteria considered by consumerse7

Verbatim

e7

“Snap bean pod color is not an overriding selection criterion, but only one of many criteria considered by consumers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1729 · show in text ↑