Paper · 1997 · Plant Disease

Frequency and Timing of Fungicide Applications for the Control of Gray Leaf Spot in Maize

J. M. J. Ward; M. D. Laing; F. H. J. Rijkenberg

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Timing and frequency of fungicide treatments for management and control of gray leaf spot of maize, caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis, were quantified with the logistic model and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC). Control was most effective when spraying commenced as disease severity levels reached 2 to 3% of the leaf area blighted and when lesions were restricted to the basal five leaves of the maize plant. Highest grain yields were achieved with treatments providing disease control until the crop was physiologically mature. To provide this length of control, the frequency and number of fungicide applications varied with the stage of host development when disease was first apparent; with early infections, more fungicide treatments were necessary to provide protection until physiological maturity. Yield responses to fungicides appeared to be a function of the growth stage of the host when sprays were initiated, the amount of disease at spray date, the length of fungicide control, and effective control through to physiological maturity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gray leaf spot control in maize was most effective when spraying began as disease severity reached 2 to 3% of the leaf area blighted and lesions were restricted to the basal five leaves.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
spraying commenced as disease severity levels reached 2 to 3% of the leaf area blightede1
Interactor
Cercospora zeae-maydisCercospora zeae-maydise0pathogen
Outcome
Controle1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
2 to 3%e1
Qualifier
when lesions were restricted to the basal five leaves of the maize plante1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora zeae-maydis
Cercospora zeae-maydis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaren Mueller, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timing and frequency of fungicide treatments for management and control of gray leaf spot of maize, caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis, were quantified with the logistic model and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control was most effective when spraying commenced as disease severity levels reached 2 to 3% of the leaf area blighted and when lesions were restricted to the basal five leaves of the maize plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest maize grain yields were achieved with fungicide treatments that controlled disease until physiological maturity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
treatments providing disease control until the crop was physiologically maturee2
Outcome
grain yieldse2
Direction
Higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timing and frequency of fungicide treatments for management and control of gray leaf spot of maize, caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis, were quantified with the logistic model and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest grain yields were achieved with treatments providing disease control until the crop was physiologically mature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–537 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With early infections, more fungicide treatments were necessary to protect maize until physiological maturity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
Cercospora zeae-maydisCercospora zeae-maydise0pathogen
Outcome
fungicide treatmentse3
Direction
moree3
Qualifier
with early infectionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora zeae-maydis
Cercospora zeae-maydis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDaren Mueller, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timing and frequency of fungicide treatments for management and control of gray leaf spot of maize, caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis, were quantified with the logistic model and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e3

“with early infections, more fungicide treatments were necessary to provide protection until physiological maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–814 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The frequency and number of fungicide applications in maize varied with the host development stage when disease was first apparent.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
stage of host development when disease was first apparente5
Outcome
frequency and number of fungicide applicationse5
Direction
variede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timing and frequency of fungicide treatments for management and control of gray leaf spot of maize, caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis, were quantified with the logistic model and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e5

“the frequency and number of fungicide applications varied with the stage of host development when disease was first apparent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–698 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield responses to fungicides appeared to depend on host growth stage at spray start, disease amount at spray date, length of control, and control through maturity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
fungicidese4
Outcome
Yield responses to fungicidese4
Qualifier
the growth stage of the host when sprays were initiatede4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timing and frequency of fungicide treatments for management and control of gray leaf spot of maize, caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis, were quantified with the logistic model and area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 · show in text ↑
e4

“Yield responses to fungicides appeared to be a function of the growth stage of the host when sprays were initiated, the amount of disease at spray date, the length of fungicide control, and effective control through to physiological maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1057 · show in text ↑

application · Cercospora zeae-maydis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.