Abstract
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) is a fast growing crop which covers the soil surface and produces large quantities of (organic) plant biomass. It has been difficult to improve the growth and productivity of these varieties of crop. However, it has been observed that if the dual purpose cowpea is cut before senescence, it can regenerate and re-produce good crop growth in the savannah regions of the tropics. Therefore, this study was carried out on the research field of the Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria, during the 2002 to 2005 wet seasons, to evaluate the influence of intra-row spacing, innovative clipping management and time on the growth of dual purpose cowpea. The treatments were laid out in a Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design, replicated three times. The data was analyzed statistically using the analysis of variance test (ANOVA), and the means compared using the Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The result of this investigation indicated that number of branches plant -1 and vine length was highest at the closest (15 cm) intra-row spacing. While leaf fresh and dry weights plant -1 , and stem fresh and dry weights plant -1 were generally higher at 30 cm intra-row spacing. Lower number of branches plant -1 , stem fresh and dry weights plant -1 , and vine length plant -1 were recorded at 64 DAP. Conversely, fresh fodder yield of plots clipped at 74 and 84 DAP were 62 and 59% higher than those of the control (unclipped) plots. On the whole, clipped cowpea showed a 100% potential regenerative capacity. Thus large amounts (15 tha -1 ) of fresh organic plant material or biomass (clipped fodder) were produced on-farm/in-situ. It can be concluded that the adoption of this innovative clipping management technology could facilitate sustain growth of the cowpea crop and holds a veritable potential towards enhancing the food security situation of the vast majority of these low income and low technology farmers in the savannahs of sub-Saharan Africa. Indeed, the large amounts of (organic) plant material or biomass (clipped fodder biomass) produced on-farm could be profitably used for organic soil fertility maintenance and/or improvement or alternatively utilized or sold as animal feed (fodder) to generate and/or supplement family incomes for these low inputs, low technology, resource poor farmers. This underscores the encouraging impact this technology holds as a veritable tool towards improved economic/living conditions of these predominantly poor rural farmers. In this manner, the negative effects of poverty are ameliorated through positive impacts on food insecurity in the region.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The closest 15 cm spacing maximized branch number and vine length.
- Taxon
- Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- 15 cm) intra-row spacinge0
- Outcome
- number of branches plant -1 and vine lengthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“number of branches plant -1 and vine length was highest at the closest (15 cm) intra-row spacing.”
t0“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 30 cm spacing, leaf fresh and dry weight and stem fresh and dry weight were generally higher.
- Taxon
- Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- 30 cm intra-row spacinge0
- Outcome
- leaf fresh and dry weights plant -1 , and stem fresh and dry weights plant -1e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“leaf fresh and dry weights plant -1 , and stem fresh and dry weights plant -1 were generally higher at 30 cm intra-row spacing.”
t0“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 64 DAP, branch number, stem fresh and dry weight, and vine length were lower.
- Taxon
- Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Outcome
- number of branches plant -1 , stem fresh and dry weights plant -1 , and vine length plant -1e0
- Direction
- Lowere0
- Qualifier
- 64 DAPe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lower number of branches plant -1 , stem fresh and dry weights plant -1 , and vine length plant -1 were recorded at 64 DAP.”
t0“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping at 74 DAP increased fresh fodder yield 62% over unclipped control.
- Taxon
- Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- clipped at 74e0
- Outcome
- fresh fodder yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 62e0
- Comparator
- control (unclipped) plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fresh fodder yield of plots clipped at 74 and 84 DAP were 62 and 59% higher than those of the control (unclipped) plots.”
t0“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping at 84 DAP increased fresh fodder yield 59% over unclipped control.
- Taxon
- Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- 84 DAPe0
- Outcome
- fresh fodder yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 59%e0
- Comparator
- control (unclipped) plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fresh fodder yield of plots clipped at 74 and 84 DAP were 62 and 59% higher than those of the control (unclipped) plots.”
t0“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipped cowpea showed 100% regenerative capacity.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- clippede0
- Outcome
- potential regenerative capacitye0
- Value
- 100%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“clipped cowpea showed a 100% potential regenerative capacity.”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipped cowpea produced 15 t per hectare of fresh biomass on farm.
- Taxon
- Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Outcome
- fresh organic plant material or biomasse0
- Value
- 15 tha -1e0
- Setting
- on-farm/in-situe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“large amounts (15 tha -1 ) of fresh organic plant material or biomass (clipped fodder) were produced on-farm/in-situ.”
t0“Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend clipping management to sustain cowpea growth and improve food security.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Outcome
- adoption of this innovative clipping management technologye0
- Qualifier
- could facilitate sustain growthe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the adoption of this innovative clipping management technology could facilitate sustain growth of the cowpea crop and holds a veritable potential towards enhancing the food security situation”
The same questions in other papers
density · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →density · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.